Search Results for "Separate land compensation"

1185 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1185 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Section 34 Petition in Arbitration Dispute Over Bridge Construction. Arbitral Award Upheld as Not Contrary to Public Policy Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The appellant, Konkan Railway Corporation Limited (owner), entered into a contract with the respondent, M/s. Oriental Construction Company Limited (co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case Under National Highways Act — Enhancement of Compensation Granted Based on Comparable Sale Deeds. Market Value Determined at Rs. 150 per sq. ft. with Additional Benefits Under Section 3G(5) of the National Highways Act, 1956.

The appellant, Sri G. Ravishankar, owned 22,869 sq. ft. of land in Sy. No.49/2 of Aimangala village, Hiriyur Taluk, Chitradurga District, which was ac...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010005522012_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs Freeze on Mangrove Destruction in Maharashtra and Orders Comprehensive Satellite Mapping to Identify Protection Areas. High Court Recognizes Ecological Importance of Mangroves and Applies Precautionary Principle to Prevent Further Damage Pending Final Adjudication.

The Public Interest Litigation was filed by Bombay Environmental Action Group and another before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, seeking prote...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Unilateral Modification of Development Control Regulations by State. Held that DCRs are statutory and cannot be altered without following due process under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by D B Realty Limited and Salim Balwa (WP No.366 of 2014) and Savita Homemakers LLP and Akkshay Jain (W...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Lucknow Development Authority's Appeal in Land Acquisition Lapse Case — Possession Taken Prior to 2013 Act Precludes Deemed Lapse Under Section 24(2). Twin Conditions of Non-Possession and Non-Payment Must Be Satisfied for Lapse; Possession Taken in 2003 Vests Land in State.

The case involves an appeal by the Lucknow Development Authority against the judgment of the Allahabad High Court (Lucknow Bench) dated 03.07.2017, wh...