Search Results for "Seized Money"

1689 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1689 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Jitendra Kumar Jain, was convicted by the Special Judge, Silvassa, for offences under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of the Pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Testimony. Conviction under Sections 302, 364, 394, 201 read with 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The case pertains to an appeal filed by accused Nos. 1 and 3 against their conviction under Sections 302, 364, 394 and 201 read with Section 34 of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Failure to Prove Circumstantial Chain. Conviction under Sections 302, 201, 379 IPC read with 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The case pertains to the murder of Nilesh, whose body was found in a suitcase near a temple. The appellants, Prajakta Shyam Shelar and Prafulla Mahend...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Examines Conviction of Two Appellants for Murder and Related Offences Under Indian Penal Code. Appeal Raises Challenges to Identity of Deceased and Reliance on Circumstantial Evidence Absent DNA Confirmation.

The appeal before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay arose from the conviction of two appellants by the Sessions Court for offences under Sections...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Proof of Demand and Acceptance. Conviction under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to establish essential ingredients.

The case involves two appeals against the judgment of the Special Court, Khamgaon, convicting the appellants under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 376 and 452 IPC set aside as prosecutrix's evidence was unreliable and medical evidence did not support rape.

The appellant, Sachin s/o Vaijinath Tandale, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Beed, for offences under Sections 452 and 376 of the Indi...