Search Results for "Judicial Compliance"

4514 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4514 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Examines Constitutionality of Prohibitory Orders Under Section 144 CrPC Restricting Public Assembly. Judgment Clarifies That Reasonable Restrictions on Speech and Assembly Must Be Just, Fair and Reasonable Under Articles 19 and 21.

The Supreme Court initiated a suo motu criminal writ petition regarding the incident at Ramlila Maidan on 4-5 June 2011, involving the imposition of p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Three Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Interested Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 302, 120-B, 34 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness was a chance witness with material contradictions and no independent corroboration.

The case pertains to the murder of Gurunath Jagdev Katare on 13th October 2014. The prosecution case relied heavily on the testimony of PW-1 Shivling ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Strikes Down BCCL's Tender Decision for Arbitrariness and Discrimination. The Supreme Court upholds fairness and transparency in government contracts, ensuring compliance with constitutional principles.

The court held that government authorities, while exercising discretion in contractual matters, must ensure fairness, transparency, and equality. The ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Tenant Defendants in Possession Suit, Sets Aside Injunction. Court holds that tenants in possession cannot be injuncted without a decree for possession, and a suit for injunction simpliciter is maintainable against a landlord.

The case involves two appeals arising from a common order of the Learned Single Judge dated 6th September 2021. The Appellant in Appeal No.551 of 2019...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Pronounces Order on Constitutional Challenge to Karnataka On-demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016. Petitioners Assert Rules Ultra Vires Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Violative of Freedom of Trade and Commerce Under Articles 14, 19(1)(g), and 301 of the Constitution.

The Karnataka High Court considered a batch of writ petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Karnataka On-demand Transportation Techno...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Karnataka On-Demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016. Petitioners Allege Rules Are Ultra Vires Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Violate Fundamental Rights.

The writ petitions arose from the notification of the Karnataka On-Demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016, by the State Government o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010069912016_1

...