Search Results for "Bombay Tenancy Act, 1948"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Bombay Tenancy Act, 1948"

390 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 390 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Property Tax Reassessment Under Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 — Reassessment Based on Capital Value Method Without Proper Notice and Opportunity of Hearing Set Aside. Court Held That Reassessment Must Be Based on Fair Market Value as on 1st April 2010 and Not on Arbitrary Valuation.

29 Jul 2019

The petitioners, residents of Narsinha Prasad Building and Narsinha Prasad Annex Building in Vile Parle (East), Mumbai, challenged the reassessment of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Seeking Protection of Grazing Land and Water Pond for Village Cattle. Court Holds That Petitioner Failed to Establish Any Legal Right or Public Duty, and the Dispute Appears to Be Private in Nature.

8 Mar 2017

The petitioner, a farmer, filed a Public Interest Litigation seeking directions to the State authorities to permit the use of land (new Gut No.38 and ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Suit — Lower Appellate Court Failed to Re-appreciate Evidence. The Court held that the first appellate court's non-application of mind to evidence constituted a substantial question of law under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, warranting remand for fresh consideration.

12 Nov 2025

The case involves a second appeal filed by the original defendant, Krishnabai Babya Navale, challenging the judgment dated 21.01.2017 passed by the le...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Award Set Aside for Patent Illegality and Violation of Natural Justice. Court Held That Arbitrator Cannot Award Interest on Interest Without Agreement and Must Decide All Claims Raised Before It.

8 Jun 2026

The present judgment arises out of a Writ Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an arbitral award passed by a sole arbit...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Allows Appeal in Tenancy Dispute, Remands Suit for Fresh Consideration Due to Procedural Irregularities. Trial Court's Failure to Consider Evidence and Frame Issues Vitiated the Judgment Under Section 96 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

29 Jan 2026

The case involves a first appeal filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the judgment and decree dated 07.04.2024 pas...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Deputy Commissioner's Order in Land Grant Cancellation Case Due to Inordinate 46-Year Delay. The Court held that the exercise of revisional power under Section 136(3) of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 must be within a reasonable time, and the cancellation of revenue entries after more than four decades was unsustainable, particularly when the original grant had never been challenged and revenue entries enjoyed presumptive value under Section 133.

13 Jan 2020

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 24.10.2011 passed by the Depu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Widows' Petition for Succession Certificate Under Section 372 of Indian Succession Act, 1925 — Held That Widows and Minor Children of Deceased Coparceners Are Entitled to Equal Share in Joint Family Property Despite Objections by Male Coparceners.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, being the widows and minor children of deceased coparceners (Abhay Vithal Mandle, Raosaheb Vithal Mandle, and Baban Vithal Mandle), f...

High Court

Bombay High Court Reserves Judgment in Section 34 Petition Challenging Arbitral Award Alleging Res Judicata and Patent Illegality; Decision on Coercion and Interest Awaited.

19 Dec 2025

The petition challenged an arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The petitioner, a multi-state co-operative b...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Challenging Demolition Order for Construction of Gutter and Pathway. Petitioners Contend that No Regular Line Was Prescribed as Mandated by Section 176 of Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Townships Act, 1965.

12 Aug 2011

The writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India was filed by T.R. Ranka and others, who claimed to be owners or tenants of s...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Allows Second Appeal Challenging Partition Decree – Defendant No. 2 Contests Allocation of 1/4th Share in Suit Property

8 Apr 2025

The second appeal arises from a suit for partition and separate possession filed by the respondents (original plaintiffs) against the appellant (defen...

33 34 35 36 37

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)