WRIT PETITION NO.1930 OF 2011
26 May 2025...
Search Results for "receiver sale"
453 result(s) found
Found 453 result(s)
High Court
Trademark Dispute: Examination of Ex-Parte Injunction and Material Disclosure Obligations.
25 Oct 2024The case concerns a trademark dispute where Dharampal Satyapal Foods Ltd., the defendant, sought to vacate an ex-parte injunction granted to Parle Pro...
- 395
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Plaint in Specific Performance Suit — Partnership Bar Under Section 69 Not Attracted Where Partner's Name Entered in Register of Firms with Retrospective Effect. The court held that a belated entry of a partner's name in the Register of Firms with retrospective effect from a date prior to the suit cures any defect regarding the partner's status, and the plaint cannot be rejected under Order VII Rule 11 CPC.
19 Sep 2024The case arises from a Civil Revision Application filed by the defendant (applicant) against an order of the 3rd Civil Judge, Senior Division, Dhule, ...
- 776
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Asset Reconstruction Company's Petition Against DRT Interim Relief in SARFAESI Act Case — Assignment of Debt by IIFL Upheld. The court set aside the DRT and DRAT orders granting ad-interim relief restraining the petitioner from taking steps in respect of secured assets under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, as the tribunals failed to consider the validity of the assignment and the balance of convenience.
18 Jan 2023The petitioner, ASREC (India) Ltd., an Asset Reconstruction Company, challenged the order of the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) dated 2 June 2022 granti...
- 28
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Civil Appeal in Property Title Dispute, Upholding High Court's Reversal of Trial Court Decree. The plaintiff failed to discharge the burden of proof to establish ownership of Schedule 'A' property under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, based on insufficient evidence including deeds and lack of lease documentation.
4 Jan 2023The dispute originated from a title suit filed in 1986 by Smriti Debbarma on behalf of Maharani Chandratara Devi, seeking declaration of ownership ove...
- 220
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark and Copyright Infringement Suit Over Soybean Oil Labels — Deceptive Similarity Established Despite Minor Variations. The court held that the defendant's label for soybean oil was deceptively similar to the plaintiff's registered label mark and artistic work, and granted an interim injunction under the Trade Marks Act, 1999 and the Copyright Act, 1957.
9 Mar 2021The plaintiff, Sanjay Soya Private Limited, filed a suit for trademark and copyright infringement against the defendant, Narayani Trading Company, all...
- 21
High Court
High Court Acquits Accused in Electricity Theft Case Due to Lack of Evidence. Conviction under Section 136 of Electricity Act, 2003 set aside as prosecution failed to prove theft beyond reasonable doubt.
3 Mar 2020The appellant, Kenchanna, was convicted by the I Additional Sessions Judge, Tumkur, in Spl. C. No.285/2008 for an offence punishable under Section 136...
- 63
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Refusal to Condon 902-Day Delay in Setting Aside Ex-Parte Order. Delay of 902 days in seeking to set aside order 'Suit to proceed without written statement' not sufficiently explained; Court upholds trial court's refusal to condone delay.
22 Feb 2018The petitioner, Rupchand Rajmalji Jain (Sancheti), was defendant No.2 in a suit filed before the City Civil Court, Mumbai. The suit was originally fil...
- 106
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Winding Up Petition Against Varun Global Limited for Non-Payment of Loan Debt. Life Insurance Corporation of India Succeeds in Proving Company's Inability to Pay Debts Under Sections 433(e) and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956.
23 Dec 2016The petitioner, Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC), filed a company petition under Sections 433(e) and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956, seeking ...
- 160
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Accused in Cheating Case Due to Civil Nature of Dispute and Lack of Criminal Intent. Failure to Perform Contractual Obligation Does Not Attract Offences Under Sections 406, 420, 120B IPC Without Evidence of Dishonest Intention at Inception.
10 Dec 2015The judgment arises from a criminal application and writ petition filed by Mahendra Premji Gangar and Kalyanji Premji Gangar (applicants/petitioners),...
- 188
