Search Results for "prison conditions"

594 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 594 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Unproven Age of Victim. Birth Certificate with overwriting and lack of ossification test render age of victim unproven, vitiating conviction under Sections 376(2)(i),(n) IPC, Goa Children's Act, and POCSO Act.

The appellant, Santosh Gore, was convicted by the Children's Court for the State of Goa in Special Case No.36/2017 for offences under Section 376(2)(i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind — Detenu's Bail in Main Offence Not Considered, Rendering Subjective Satisfaction Invalid.

The petitioner, father of the detenu, challenged the preventive detention order dated 13th November 2019 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Railway...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Conviction for Murder Over Boundary Dispute — Appellant Convicted Under Section 302 IPC for Shooting Deceased During Construction of Compound Wall. The court affirmed that the dying declaration and recovery of weapon established guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Sadanand Shivaji Kadam, a former police inspector aged 86, was convicted by the VII Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, for the murder of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder Under Section 302 IPC — Life Sentence Confirmed. Accused's Act of Stabbing Deceased Multiple Times After Trivial Quarrel Does Not Fall Under Exception 4 of Section 300 IPC.

The appellant, Narsinh Arjun Jadhav, was convicted by the Sessions Court, Greater Bombay, for the murder of Rajesh Kanojiya under Section 302 of the I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Two Accused for Murder and Robbery in Truck Incident — Life Imprisonment Confirmed. The court held that the circumstantial evidence including last seen and recovery of stolen property established guilt under Sections 302, 392, 397 read with Section 34 IPC.

The case pertains to the conviction of two appellants, Palani @ Panni Wilswami Shetty (A1) and Kishor @ Kishya Raghunath Londhe (A2), by the Additiona...