Search Results for "illegal import"

1030 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1030 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Confiscation of Lithium Ion Cells for Want of Show Cause Notice; Section 124 Customs Act, 1962 Mandates Prior Hearing. Non-Compliance with Natural Justice Renders Confiscation Order Void, Liberty Granted to Seek Release of Detained Goods.

Background: The petitioner, a subsidiary of Bajaj Auto Ltd., is engaged in the manufacture and sale of electric scooters and imported consignments of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Jurisdiction of Civil Court in Possession Dispute Involving Family Members. Section 33 of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 Held Not to Bar Suit as Tenancy Question Not Directly Arising.

The appeal before the Division Bench of the Bombay High Court arose from an order of a learned Single Judge deciding a preliminary issue of jurisdicti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Highest Bidder in Excise Case; Holds Cancellation of Sale Invalid and Directs Grant of Licences. Interpretation of Rule 19 of Mysore Excise Rules: Requirements of Statement and Security Inapplicable When Shops in Multiple Tehsils, and 'At Once' Means Reasonable Time.

In an appeal before the Supreme Court of India, the appellant, who was the highest bidder for the exclusive privilege of retail vend of toddy and arra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO. 3748 OF 2011

The dispute concerns allocation of natural gas from the KG D6 fields in the Krishna-Godavari Basin, where a significant reduction in production occurr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Seizure of Vehicles Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code — Seizure Without Notice and Opportunity of Hearing Held Illegal. Section 53 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 Does Not Authorize Seizure of Vehicles; Principles of Natural Justice Violated.

The petitioners filed multiple writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, challenging t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in TADA Case Due to Involuntary Confession and Lack of Corroboration. Confession recorded under Section 15 of TADA Act found not voluntary as guidelines in Kartar Singh were not followed, and confession of co-accused not admissible without joint trial.

The appellant, Raja @ Ayyappan, was convicted by the Designated Court under the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (TADA) for ...