Search Results for "detention order quashed"

1141 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1141 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Petition Challenging Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Detention under Section 2(c) of Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 Quashed as Mechanical Exercise of Power Without Application of Mind.

The petitioner, Sakir @ Bono Rustambhai Shekh, through his mother Habibabanu Rustambhai Shekh, challenged the legality and validity of a preventive de...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Showing Threat to Public Order. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not establish disturbance to public order.

The petitioner, Nikhil Bharatbhai Lakum, was preventively detained by an order dated 08.01.2026 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Ahmedabad, under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Linking Detenue's Activities to Public Order Disturbance. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not establish threat to public order.

The petitioner, Nagjibhai Prabhatbhai Rabari, was preventively detained by the Police Commissioner, Ahmedabad City, under the Gujarat Prevention of An...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition Due to Unexplained Delay in Preventive Detention Order. Delay of 37 Days Between Arrest and Detention Order Snaps Live and Proximate Link, Rendering Detention Invalid Under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982.

The petitioner, Chinaponnu, grandmother of the detenu Vijay, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition in Preventive Detention Case Due to Unexplained Delay. Delay of 51 days between arrest and detention order held to snap live link, rendering detention invalid under Article 22(5) of Constitution.

The petitioner, Pavithra R, the elder sister of the detenu Ajith Kumar, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition, Quashes Detention Order Due to Unexplained Delay Between Arrest and Detention Order. Preventive Detention Order Under Sexual Offender Act Set Aside as Live Link Snapped.

The petitioner, Kumaresan, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madras High Court challenging the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Non-Consideration of Representation. Failure to Consider Detenu's Representation Before Confirmation Violates Article 22(5) of the Constitution.

The petitioner, Wasim @ Mukri A.Salar, was detained under Section 3(1) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Default Bail Under Section 167(2) CrPC for Failure to Pass Specific Remand Extension Order. Mandatory Production of Accused and Specific Order Required for Valid Extension of Police Custody Remand.

The petitioner, Parshuram s/o Bajirao Dongre, was arrested on 23.7.2017 in connection with Crime No. 85/2017 registered at Aheri Police Station, Gadch...