Search Results for "Representative appointment"

807 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 807 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Uttar Pradesh Board of Madarsa Education Act, 2004 as Valid Regulatory Legislation. High Court erred in striking down entire Act; provisions conflicting with UGC Act are severable.

The Supreme Court considered appeals against the Allahabad High Court's judgment striking down the Uttar Pradesh Board of Madarsa Education Act, 2004 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Probate of Will Executed on Same Day as Testatrix's Death, Upholding Its Validity Despite Challenge by Legal Heir. The court held that the execution of the Will was duly proved by attesting witnesses and the suspicious circumstances were dispelled.

The plaintiff, Pravin Laxmidas Tanna, filed a suit seeking probate of the last Will and Testament dated 15.01.2004 of Savita Hiralal Bhindora, who exp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Sole Arbitrator in Commercial Dispute Over Purchase Orders. Arbitration Clause in Purchase Orders Held Binding Despite Absence of Signed Agreement, as Parties Acted on Purchase Orders Containing Arbitration Clause.

The applicant, Bajaj Electricals Limited, filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Upholds Compensation Award in Motor Accident Claim — Negligence of Driver Proved, Insurance Company Liable to Pay. Deceased was a 42-year-old businessman earning Rs. 15,000 per month; Tribunal's assessment of income and multiplier upheld.

The appeal was filed by The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. against the judgment and award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bhoom, in M.A.C.P. No.7...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Single L-1BF License for Imported Foreign Liquor in Haryana — Rule 24(i-eeee) Held Ultra Vires Punjab Excise Act, 1914. State Government's Exclusive Power Under Section 58(2)(e) to Regulate Licenses in Local Areas Cannot Be Delegated to Financial Commissioner.

The appellant, International Spirits and Wines Association of India, challenged Rule 24(i-eeee) of the Haryana Liquor License Rules, 1970, as amended ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Single L-1BF License for Imported Foreign Liquor in Haryana. Rule 24(i-eeee) of Haryana Liquor License Rules, 1970 Held Ultra Vires Punjab Excise Act, 1914 as State Government Cannot Delegate Power to Determine Number of Licenses for Entire State.

The appellant, International Spirits and Wines Association of India, challenged Rule 24(i-eeee) of the Haryana Liquor License Rules, 1970 (as amended ...