Search Results for "Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976"

410 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 410 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appellant's Second Appeal in Housing Board Dispute — Unauthorized Construction Not Ipso Facto Nuisance but Concurrent Findings Upheld. Civil Court Has Jurisdiction Despite Section 71 Bar of Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976 as Suit Pertains to Private Rights.

The case involves a second appeal by the original defendant No.1, Sau. Smita Mohod, against concurrent judgments and decrees passed by the Trial Court...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes NIT Communication in Gunthewari Regularization Case — Reservation Lifted by Prior Government Resolution. Petitioner Society's plots held not reserved for Higher Education as reservation was lifted under Section 37 of MRTP Act, 1966 read with Gunthewari Act, 2001.

The petitioner, Gousiya Labour Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., developed a residential layout on Survey Nos. 52 and 54, Mouza-Bidipeth, Nagpur, and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Protection of Stall in Slum Area — Petitioner Failed to Establish Possession Prior to Cut-off Date of 1.1.1995. Land Belonging to MHADA Vests in Slum Rehabilitation Authority Under Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971.

The petitioner, Shriniwas Krishna Suvarna, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking protection for his stall located on land belongi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging MHADA's Surplus Area Demand in Redevelopment — Condition 22 of NOC Valid Under MHAD Act. Petitioners' Challenge to Communication Dated 6 July 2007 and Appellate Order Rejected.

The petitioners, owners of a property admeasuring about 546 sq. mtrs. in Mumbai, sought redevelopment and obtained a No Objection Certificate (NOC) fr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to SRA Order in Slum Rehabilitation Scheme. CEO's Direction to Process Letter of Intent Upheld as 70% Consent of Eligible Members Was Validly Obtained Under DCR 33(10).

The case involves a slum rehabilitation scheme under DCR 33(10) of the Development Control Regulations for Greater Mumbai. The petitioners, Lokhandwal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Part Occupation Certificate for Building Height Violation. Flat Purchasers Cannot Seek Revocation of Occupation Certificate as They Have Alternative Remedy Under RERA and No Vested Right to Challenge Planning Permissions.

The petitioners, Sanjay Phulwaria and others, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court challe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Validity of Deemed Membership under Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act. Transfer of Leasehold Plot through Auction Challenged as Violative of Society Byelaws and Lease Deed Conditions.

The Writ Petition arises from a dispute concerning deemed membership in a cooperative housing society. The petitioner, The Sopan Baug Cooperative Hous...