Search Results for "Common ground"

9231 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 9231 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Cadila Pharmaceuticals in Passing Off Action by Medley Laboratories. Marks 'HB TONE' and 'RB TONE' Held Deceptively Similar for Pharmaceutical Products, Injunction Confirmed.

The appeal arises from a suit filed by the respondents (original plaintiffs) against the appellant (original defendant) for infringement and passing o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Hears Appeal Against Rejection of Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit. The Court Examines Whether Trial Court Erred in Denying Interim Protection Despite Registered Device Mark and Alleged Joint Use of the 'Kshetrapal' Mark.

The dispute centered on the use of the trademark 'Shree Kshetrapal' / 'Kshetrapal Construction' by two individuals in the construction business in Guj...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Disposes of Appeals and Revision in Kidnapping and Murder Case. Conviction under Sections 364-A, 302, 201, 120-B of IPC and Section 8 of Goa Children's Act, 2003, was Challenged by Accused, and State Appealed Against Set-Off under Section 428 CrPC.

The High Court of Bombay at Goa heard together five criminal appeals and one criminal revision application arising from the judgment and order dated 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Tenant's Revision in Rent Arrears Case — Tenant Failed to Pay Rent Despite Notice Under Section 12(2) of Bombay Rent Act. Eviction Decree Confirmed as Tenant's Default Attracts Section 12(3)(a) of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947.

The case involves a civil revision application under Section 29(2) of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 (the Rent Act)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Pronounces Order on Constitutional Challenge to Karnataka On-demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016. Petitioners Assert Rules Ultra Vires Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Violative of Freedom of Trade and Commerce Under Articles 14, 19(1)(g), and 301 of the Constitution.

The Karnataka High Court considered a batch of writ petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Karnataka On-demand Transportation Techno...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Karnataka On-Demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016. Petitioners Allege Rules Are Ultra Vires Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Violate Fundamental Rights.

The writ petitions arose from the notification of the Karnataka On-Demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016, by the State Government o...