Search Results for "section 24(2)"

512 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 512 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Uber's Appeal Against CCI Investigation Order for Alleged Abuse of Dominant Position Through Predatory Pricing. The Court held that information showing Uber incurred a loss of Rs.204 per trip was sufficient to form a prima facie case under Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2002.

The Supreme Court dismissed two civil appeals filed by Uber India Systems Pvt. Ltd. against orders of the Competition Commission of India (CCI) and th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Banks to Deny Legal Representation in Wilful Defaulter Proceedings. In-House Committees of Banks Are Not Tribunals Under Section 30 of Advocates Act, 1961, and Right to Lawyer Is Not Part of Natural Justice.

The Supreme Court considered appeals against the Delhi High Court judgment which held that a borrower is entitled to be represented by a lawyer before...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in Mining Dispute — Quashes Forest Officer's Stop Order for Lack of Jurisdiction. License Under Maharashtra Minerals Rules Valid for Transport of Bauxite from Non-Forest Land, No Prior Approval Under Forest (Conservation) Act Required.

The petitioner, Dharti Industries Pvt. Ltd., a company engaged in mining and processing of minerals, challenged a communication dated 19.12.2017 issue...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Probate Caveat Case — Real Brother Has Caveatable Interest as Creditor and Under Family Settlement. Section 284 of Indian Succession Act, 1925 interpreted to include persons with slight interest in estate.

The case involves an appeal against an order of a learned single Judge of the Bombay High Court dismissing a caveat filed by the appellant, Purushotta...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Part in Recovery of Possession Case — Appellant Not a Tenant, No Substantial Question of Law Arises. The appellate court's order granting entire damages without separate inquiry under Order 20 Rule 12 CPC set aside, trial court's direction for inquiry restored.

The appellant, Rajendra Suryakant More, was a former employee of the respondent company, M/s Fixolite Wires & Cables Pvt. Ltd. He was provided with a ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging GST Cancellation Due to Violation of Natural Justice. Registration Cancelled Without Proper Notice and Opportunity of Hearing, Set Aside with Restoration.

The petitioner, Rawman Metal & Alloys, a proprietorship concern, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the ...