Search Results for "related party transactions"

850 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 850 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Benami Property Dispute Under Benami Transaction (Prohibition) Act, 1988. Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Property Was Held for Benefit of Hindu Undivided Family Coparceners Under Section 4(3)(a), Making Suit Barred Under Section 4(1).

The dispute originated from a civil suit filed by Laxmi Prasad, his wife, and two daughters against his two sons and subsequent purchasers, seeking de...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case Regarding Redemption Fine as Business Expenditure. Redemption fine of Rs. 75,00,000 paid for unauthorized import of almonds held allowable as business expenditure under Section 37 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

The appeal was filed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) which allowed the asses...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Rejects Plaint in Money Recovery Suit - Applicant Application Under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC Succeeds -Plaintiff' Suit Barred by Maharashtra Money Lending Act Due to Unlicensed Lending

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay heard an interim application filed by the defendant under Order VII Rule 11(d) of the Code of Civil Procedure, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case — Reverses Acquittal Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Presumption of Legally Enforceable Debt Under Section 139 N.I. Act Not Rebutted by Accused.

The appellant, M/s. Ajmera Housing Corporation, a partnership firm, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, again...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appellant in Amendment of Plaint to Add Alternative Claim Despite Limitation Bar. All necessary facts already pleaded; interest of justice warranted amendment under Order VI Rule 17 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

The dispute arose from a commercial transaction where the appellants, L. J. Leach and Company Ltd., filed a suit for damages against the respondents, ...