WRIT PETITION NO. 6608 OF 2016
5 Jul 2016...
Search Results for "quality testing"
348 result(s) found
Found 348 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement Suit by 'VOGUE' Magazine Owner Against 'JUST IN VOGUE' Retail Services. Well-Known Mark 'VOGUE' Protected Against Use for Dissimilar Services Under Section 29(4) of Trade Marks Act, 1999.
19 Sep 2016The Plaintiffs, Advance Magazine Publishers, Inc. and its subsidiary, are the proprietors and users of the trademark 'VOGUE' in respect of magazines a...
- 180
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Non-Application of Mind — Insufficient Time Between Endorsement of In-Camera Statements and Issuance of Detention Order. The court held that the Detaining Authority did not have sufficient time to apply its mind properly, vitiating the detention order under Section 2(a)(iv-a) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981.
10 Oct 2016The petitioner, a friend of the detenu Nilesh Dnyaneshwar Desale, challenged the detention order dated 16.3.2016 passed by the District Magistrate, Ja...
- 113
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Reverses Acquittal and Restores Conviction in Rape Case Involving Child Victim. The Court Held That the High Court Erred in Disregarding the Sole Testimony of the Prosecutrix and Principles of Child Witness Appreciation Under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, While Deprecating the Disclosure of Victim Identity Under Section 228A IPC.
24 Mar 2026The State of Himachal Pradesh appealed against the High Court's judgment acquitting the respondent-accused in a case involving the sexual assault of a...
- 804
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Acquits Appellant in Kidnapping and Murder Case Due to Insufficient Evidence and Procedural Defects. Conviction under Sections 363, 302, and 201 of Indian Penal Code, 1860, was overturned as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt based on unreliable confession and lack of corroborative evidence.
25 Mar 2026The appeal arose from a judgment and order dated 9th July 2024 by the Special Judge (POCSO), Thane, convicting the appellant under Sections 363, 302, ...
- 374
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Grants Bail to Accused in Murder Case Under KCOCA — Prima Facie Case Not Made Out Against Petitioners. Court Held That Mere Presence at Scene or Association with Co-Accused Without Active Participation Does Not Attract Offences Under Karnataka Control of Organised Crime Act, 2000.
16 Jul 2024The judgment pertains to three criminal petitions filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking regular bail in connection ...
- 233
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Unsuccessful Party's Section 9 Petition in Arbitration Dispute — Maintainability Upheld After Supreme Court's Home Care Retail Marts Judgment. The court held that a losing party can seek interim measures under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, overruling the earlier Division Bench decision in Dirk India.
6 May 2026The judgment arises from a Commercial Arbitration Petition filed by Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited (ONGC) against Larsen & Toubro Limited (L&...
- 137
High Court
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Double Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence — Failure to Prove Motive and Inconsistencies in Evidence Lead to Benefit of Doubt. Conviction under Section 302 IPC for murder of wife and daughter set aside as prosecution failed to establish complete chain of circumstances.
6 Sep 2017The appellant, Bhaurao s/o Maroti Keskar, was convicted under Section 302 IPC for the murder of his wife and one-and-a-half-month-old daughter. The pr...
- 137
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Case Against Manufacturer in Fertilizer Quality Dispute Due to Invalid Appointment of Complainant as Inspector. Appointment of Inspector Under Clause 27 of Fertilizer (Control) Order, 1985 Must Be Notified by Central Government, Not State Government, Rendering Complaint Not Maintainable.
7 Aug 2018The petitioners, M/s. Adinath Agro Industries and its manager Ishan Jain, were accused nos. 4 and 5 in Regular Criminal Case No. 34 of 2017 pending be...
- 65
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes MSEFC Award for Lack of Jurisdiction Over Buyer Outside Maharashtra. Territorial Jurisdiction of Facilitation Council Under Section 18 of MSMED Act, 2006 Cannot Extend to Buyers Located Outside Its Territorial Limits.
6 Aug 2018The petitioner, Gujarat State Petronet Ltd., a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 with its registered office in Gandhinagar, Gujarat, ...
- 113
