Search Results for "minimum imprisonment"

758 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 758 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Rape of Minor in Absence of Direct Evidence of Penetration. Circumstantial Evidence and Medical Report Sufficient to Prove Guilt Under Section 376(2)(f) IPC.

The appellant, Deepak Shankarrao Borkar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Wardha, in Special Case No. 7 of 2012 for offences under Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Kidnapping and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Prosecution Failed to Prove Offences Under Sections 366A and 376 IPC Beyond Reasonable Doubt as Victim's Testimony Was Unreliable and Medical Evidence Did Not Support Allegations.

The appellant, Kadamban, was convicted by the Principal District & Sessions Judge, Tumkur, in S.C. No. 274/2012 for offences under Sections 366A (kidn...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Compensation Claim for Alleged Illegal Detention in Murder Case — Section 433-A CrPC Mandates Minimum 14 Years Actual Imprisonment for Life Sentence Under Section 302 IPC, Remission Cannot Reduce Sentence Below 14 Years.

The petitioner, Taranjitsingh alias Ranjitsingh, was arrested on 30.08.1975 for murder under Section 302 IPC. He was acquitted by the Sessions Court i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Sections 376(2), 452, 323, 504, 506 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Dasu s/o Kisan Waghmare, was convicted by the Special Judge, Majalgaon, in Special Case No. 14 of 2014 for offences under Sections 452,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Rape and Kidnapping Case — Prosecution Fails to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Minor Victim's Testimony Found Unreliable Due to Contradictions and Lack of Corroboration Under Sections 363, 366-A, 376, 506 IPC.

The State of Karnataka appealed against the acquittal of the accused Wasim Pasha @ Abbu for offences under Sections 363, 366-A, 376, and 506 of the In...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The case involves an appeal against conviction for murder. The appellants were convicted for the murder of their uncle, Yeshwant, based on allegations...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Rape of Minor Under POCSO Act — Victim's Testimony Found Credible and Age Proved by School Records. The court held that minor contradictions do not discredit the victim's evidence and the presumption under Section 29 POCSO Act applies.

The appellant, Akash s/o Devanand Tempe, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Nagpur in Special Criminal (POCSO) Case No. 198/2016 for the offence pun...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC020022992017_1

These intra-court writ appeals arose from a common order dated 25.04.2017, by which a single judge of the Karnataka High Court had dismissed the appel...