Search Results for "mandate termination"

807 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 807 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in School Teacher Termination Case — Reinstatement Ordered with Back Wages. Termination of a Shikshan Sevak without prior approval under Section 5 of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977 is illegal and void.

The appellant, Ashok s/o Pandurang Janjal, was appointed as a Shikshan Sevak (probationary teacher) at Tulsabai Kawal Vidyalaya, Patur, District Akola...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Assistant Teacher Challenging Oral Termination and Non-Payment of Back Wages. Petitioner failed to prove continuous service and compliance with preconditions for remand.

The petitioner, Vilas Jijabrao Chavan, was appointed as an Assistant Teacher on 08/07/1992 and given charge of Head Master in January 1993. His appoin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Termination of Probationary Employee in Airports Authority of India — No Right to Post Confirmation. Probationer's termination without stigma and in accordance with service rules does not require hearing or reasons.

The petitioner, G.N. Mohanty, was appointed as Assistant Manager (Finance) in the Airports Authority of India (AAI) on probation for two years. His pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Considers Whether Dearness Allowance is a Fundamental Right, Hears Appeals Against High Court Mandate to Pay Central Rates. High Court's declaration of Dearness Allowance under Article 21 and direction for parity with Central Government employees challenged by State.

The State of West Bengal filed appeals by special leave challenging the orders of the High Court at Calcutta dated 20th May 2022 and 22nd September 20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Favor of Dealer in Termination Dispute. No Grounds for Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 as Arbitrator's Findings Were Plausible and Not Perverse.

The Petitioner, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. (HPCL), a government oil company, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Concil...