Search Results for "concurrent hearing"

1980 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1980 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Injunction Suit — Concurrent Findings of Possession and Title Upheld. Court holds that findings of fact by lower courts on possession and title cannot be interfered with in second appeal under Section 100 CPC unless perverse or based on no evidence.

The case involves a property dispute between the appellants (original defendants) and the respondents (original plaintiffs) over land in Udatare, Talu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Husband and In-laws Challenging Maintenance and Residence Orders Under Domestic Violence Act. Concurrent Findings of Domestic Violence and Right to Shared Household Upheld.

The case involves a criminal writ petition filed by Prashant Maggidwar and his family members (petitioners) challenging concurrent orders passed by th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Upheld. The court held that the appellants failed to prove adverse possession and the suit for partition was within limitation under Article 65 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

The case pertains to a second appeal filed by the defendants against the concurrent decrees of the trial court and the first appellate court in a suit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Succession Dispute — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Court holds that plaintiffs failed to prove they are legal heirs of deceased Perumal Naidu and that the third defendant's claim as son through second marriage was not disproved.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the unsuccessful plaintiffs (appellants) against the concurrent dismissal of their suit for declaration of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Industrial Court's Order Granting Permanency to Fixed-Term Security Guard in Saudi Arabian Airlines Case. Fixed-term employment found to be a camouflage to deny permanency benefits under MRTU & PULP Act.

The appellant, Saudi Arabian Airlines, engaged the respondent workman as a Security Guard on a fixed-term contract from 1st October 1989 for two years...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Partition Suit — No Interference Under Article 227 as Findings of Fact Are Not Perverse. Court Held That Rejection of Plaint Under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC Is Not Applicable When Suit Is Not Barred by Law and Issues Require Trial.

The present writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India was filed by the legal heirs of the original defendant No.1 (Manohar Ramchand...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Upholds Concurrent Findings of Oral Partition and Adverse Possession. The court held that an oral partition during the lifetime of the father is valid and that the plaintiff failed to prove joint possession or title to the suit properties.

The plaintiff, Rajaraman, filed a suit for partition claiming 1/3rd share in two items of property allegedly belonging to his father Nadesa Vanniyar. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Possession Suit — Upholds Concurrent Findings on Licensee's Obligation to Vacate. Unregistered Othi Deed Treated as License, Not Lease, Under Section 100 CPC.

The case involves a dispute over possession of a property in Paramakudi. The plaintiff, R.Rajasekaran, purchased the suit property by registered sale ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Settlement Deed by Father Not Invalid as Properties Were Self-Acquired, Not Ancestral. Plaintiff Failed to Prove Ancestral Nature of Suit Properties Under Hindu Succession Act, 1956.

The appellant/plaintiff filed a suit for partition and permanent injunction claiming that the suit properties were ancestral properties of Arunachala ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Suit for Declaration and Injunction — Concurrent Findings Upheld. Plaintiff Failed to Prove Title and Possession Over Suit Property; Non-Examination of Attesting Witnesses to Sale Deed Led to Adverse Inference.

The legal representatives of the original plaintiff in O.S. No. 104/1982 (old No. 215/1968) filed a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civ...