Search Results for "arbitral tribunal jurisdiction"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "arbitral tribunal jurisdiction"

1497 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1497 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 9 Petition for Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction in Foreign Award Enforcement. Court holds that under the amended Section 2(1)(e) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, only the High Court having jurisdiction over the subject matter of the award can entertain interim measures, not any court where assets are located.

9 Oct 2017

The petitioner, Trammo DMCC, a company incorporated in the UAE, obtained a foreign arbitral award against the respondent, Nagarjuna Fertilizers and Ch...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 37(2)(b) of Arbitration Act Against Arbitrator's Order Rejecting Interim Relief — Holds That Arbitrator Must Consider Prima Facie Case, Balance of Convenience, and Irreparable Loss Before Refusing Interim Injunction.

12 Oct 2012

The appellant, Spice Digital Ltd., filed an appeal under Section 37(2)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an order dated 16...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Appeal Against Order Refusing Appointment of Arbitrator Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Dispute Referred to Sole Arbitrator. The Court held that the existence of an arbitration agreement is a jurisdictional fact and once prima facie satisfied, the court must appoint an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

30 Sep 2025

The appellant, Mahindra Defence Systems Limited, filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging the order...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Termination of Arbitral Tribunal Mandate Due to Inordinate Delay in Proceedings — Appoints Retired Judge as Sole Arbitrator Under Sections 14 and 15 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The court held that failure of the arbitral tribunal to commence hearings for over seven years constituted failure to act without undue delay, justifying termination of mandate and substitution of arbitrator.

20 Jul 2015

The petitioner, Simplex Infrastructures Limited, filed an arbitration petition under Sections 14 and 15 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Award Set Aside for Patent Illegality and Violation of Natural Justice. Court held that the arbitral tribunal's rejection of the counterclaim without considering evidence and without granting an opportunity to be heard amounted to a patent illegality and breach of natural justice.

4 Feb 2025

The petitioner, Marine Electricals (India) Ltd., filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to set aside an arbi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Appeal Against Arbitral Order of Asset Disclosure and Injunction in Commercial Arbitration Dispute. Court upholds disclosure direction but modifies injunction to apply only to assets sufficient to secure the claim amount.

10 Mar 2022

The case involves a petition under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by Manish Khera and another (petitioners) challengi...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay hears multiple arbitration petitions filed by various petitioners against the same respondent. The petitions, bearing consecutive numbers, seek relief under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

23 Apr 2025

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Arbitrator's Jurisdiction Over Counter-Claim in Partnership Dispute. Allegations of fraud in counter-claim do not render it non-arbitrable unless serious and complex, under Section 16 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

3 Apr 2014

The case involves two arbitration petitions filed by Rekha Agarwal and Sunil Agarwal challenging an order of a Sole Arbitrator under Section 16 of the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Petitions, Upholds Arbitrator's Jurisdiction Over Counter-Claim in Partnership Dispute. Arbitration Clause Survives Dissolution of Firm Under Section 16 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

3 Apr 2014

The case involves two arbitration petitions challenging an order of a Sole Arbitrator under Section 16 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Ex-Parte Arbitral Award in Loan Recovery Dispute. Court holds that non-participation in arbitration despite notice and failure to prove fraud or bias does not warrant setting aside award under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

17 Jun 2013

The petitioners, The Loot (India) Pvt. Ltd. and its directors, were borrowers and guarantors who had taken a loan from Reliance Capital Limited (the f...

31 32 33 34 35

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)