Bombay High Court Nagpur Bench Hears Writ Petition Filed by 88 Individuals. Petition Challenges Unspecified Action/Omission by Unknown Respondents.
21 May 2026Judgment Analysis - Auto Generated...
Search Results for "Union Public Service Commission"
2057 result(s) found
Found 2057 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals of Irregularly Appointed Forest Officers in Seniority Dispute. Appointments Beyond Advertised Vacancies Held Illegal, Seniority Counts Only From Regularisation Date.
22 Apr 2019The case pertains to the seniority of Assistant Conservators of Forests (ACFs) in the Bihar Forest Service. The appellants were appointed on 13.04.198...
- 212
High Court
High Court Dismisses PIL Seeking Debarment of Retired CCI Officials from Legal Practice — No Cause of Action or Public Interest Established. Petition fails to demonstrate any legal right or public injury warranting interference under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
18 Jul 2018The petitioner, Dr. Savio Pereira, filed a writ petition purportedly as a public interest litigation before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru. ...
- 55
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers PIL on Infrastructure of Judiciary; Examines Primacy of High Court's Recommendations for Additional Courts. Court Notes State Government's Delays and Insistence That Its Own Views Prevail, Highlighting Need for 867 Additional Courts and Special Courts for Vulnerable Groups.
11 Oct 2018This public interest litigation was instituted by a chartered accountant, Vihar Durve, raising concerns about the infrastructure of the judiciary in t...
- 44
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Upholds Union's Challenge to BMRCL Conduct Rules Due to Appropriate Government Dispute. Central and State Governments Argue Jurisdiction Over Metro Rail Employees Under Industrial Disputes Act.
3 Nov 2025This batch of writ petitions, filed before the High Court of Karnataka under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, centered on the determination o...
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIRs Against Former Chief Minister in BDA Denotification Case — CAG Report Cannot Be Sole Basis for Criminal Prosecution Without Independent Investigation. The court held that the CAG report is not a conclusive proof of criminality and cannot be the foundation for criminal prosecution without independent investigation, and that the FIRs were registered without proper sanction under Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.
5 Jan 2016The petitioner, Shri B.S. Yeddyurappa, a former Chief Minister of Karnataka, filed multiple writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitut...
- 80
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Cancellation of Caste Validity Certificate and Rejection of Nomination in Lok Sabha Elections — Caste Scrutiny Committee Lacks Power of Review Under Section 7 of Maharashtra Caste Certificate Act, 2000. The Court held that a validity certificate issued under Section 6 of the Act cannot be cancelled by the Committee without express statutory authority and without following principles of natural justice.
24 Sep 2024The petitioner, Rashmi Barve, a Zilla Parishad member, had obtained a caste validity certificate dated 17/02/2020 from the District Caste Certificate ...
- 2749
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses PIL Challenging State's Interpretation of Supreme Court Order Allowing Post-Deadline Transportation. The Petitioner Contends That the Supreme Court's Order Under Article 142 Permitted Only Excavation Till 15 March 2018 and Not Post-Deadline Transportation.
4 May 2018The Goa Foundation, a public interest organization, filed a writ petition in the High Court of Bombay at Goa challenging the State Government's decisi...
- 50
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Union of India's Appeal in Pay Scale Parity Dispute for Naval Civilian Officers. Judicial Review Limited as Pay Fixation is Primarily an Executive Function Best Left to Expert Bodies Like Pay Commissions, Unless Grave Error is Shown.
22 Feb 2023The dispute originated from the Indian Navy Civilian Design Officers Association's challenge before the Central Administrative Tribunal against the Un...
- 255
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeals and Directs Separate Cut-Off Marks for Persons with Disabilities in Judicial Services Recruitment. The Court held that exclusion of visually impaired candidates from judicial services is unconstitutional and that PwBD candidates are entitled to relaxation of selection criteria under Section 34 of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016.
10 Mar 2025The Supreme Court of India, in a suo motu writ petition and connected matters, addressed the issue of recruitment of persons with disabilities (PwD) i...
- 928
