High Court of Bombay at Goa Delivers Judgment in Writ Petition No. 403 of 2022 and P.I.L. Writ Petition No. 32 of 2022. The Court adjudicated connected matters involving multiple respondents and state/government authorities.
8 May 2025...
Search Results for "Tender notification"
451 result(s) found
Found 451 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Petitions Challenging Appointment of Administrator and Election Notification for Cooperative Societies. Violation of Section 30 of Karnataka Cooperative Societies Act, 1959 and Rules 13, 14 of Karnataka Cooperative Societies Rules, 1960.
5 Jan 2024The petitioners, directors of various cooperative societies, challenged the appointment of an Administrator and the subsequent election notification i...
- 103
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows DDA and Govt. of NCT of Delhi Appeals in Land Acquisition Lapse Case — Acquisition Not Deemed Lapsed Under Section 24(2) of Act, 2013 When Possession Taken but Compensation Not Paid. Possession Taken on 26.05.1998 Vests Land in State; No Divesting Under Section 24(2) as per Indore Development Authority v. Manoharlal.
15 Dec 2022The case involves appeals by the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) and the Government of NCT of Delhi against a judgment of the Delhi High Court. The ...
- 160
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Quashes CVC Order Divesting CBI Director of Powers — Rule of Law and Institutional Independence Upheld. The court held that the CVC exceeded its powers under Section 8(1)(a) and 8(1)(b) of the CVC Act, 2003 read with Section 4(1) of the DSPE Act, 1946, and that the divestment of the CBI Director's functions without due process violated the rule of law.
8 Jan 2019The judgment arises from two writ petitions challenging the legality of three orders dated 23 October 2018. The first order was passed by the Central ...
- 384
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Quashes CVC Order Divesting CBI Director of Powers — Rule of Law and Institutional Independence Upheld. The court held that the CVC exceeded its powers under Section 8(1)(a) and 8(1)(b) of the CVC Act, 2003 read with Section 4(1) of the DSPE Act, 1946, and that the orders were invalid as they undermined the independence of the CBI Director.
8 Jan 2019The judgment arises from two writ petitions challenging the legality of three orders dated 23rd October 2018. The first order was passed by the Centra...
- 202
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Service Tax Reimbursement Dispute. Contractual interpretation of service tax liability under security services contract upheld by arbitrator.
21 Aug 2015The petitioner, Bombay Intelligence Security (India) Ltd., filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challengin...
- 134
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Land Acquisition Lapse Claim by Muley Family Members — Acquisition Proceedings Initiated in 1968 Deemed Lapsed Due to Non-Completion and Non-Payment of Compensation. Land Acquisition Officer directed to pass appropriate orders under Section 11A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 as the award was not made within two years of the declaration under Section 6.
18 Apr 2015The petitioners, members of the Muley family, filed two writ petitions challenging the acquisition of their land, plot No.33/1, Sheet No.40A, Ward No....
- 123
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Property Dispute — Upholds Trial Court's Decree for Declaration and Permanent Injunction. Plaintiff's Title Established Through Registered Sale Deed and Tax Records, Defendant's Adverse Possession Claim Fails for Lack of Evidence.
5 Mar 2015The case involves a property dispute where the original plaintiff, L.C. Hanumanthappa (since deceased, represented by legal representatives), filed a ...
- 67
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Property Dispute — Upholds Trial Court's Decree for Declaration and Permanent Injunction. Plaintiff's Title Established Through Registered Sale Deed and Tax Records, Defendant's Adverse Possession Claim Fails for Lack of Evidence.
5 Mar 2015The Regular First Appeal was filed by the defendant against the judgment and decree dated 16.4.2009 passed by the XV Additional City Civil Judge, Bang...
- 37
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Rent Recovery Suit — Hyderabad Rent Act Applicability During Pendency Does Not Bar Eviction Decree. Section 15(1) of Hyderabad Rent Act does not apply to decrees passed by civil court before the Act's extension to the area.
25 Jun 2012The respondent/plaintiff filed a suit for recovery of Rs. 5,200 towards arrears of rent, damages, and possession of the suit house against the appella...
- 42
