Search Results for "Separate land compensation"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Separate land compensation"

1184 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1184 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Reference for Compensation for Mining Lease Rights in Land Acquisition. Mining Lessee Not Entitled to Separate Compensation for Loss of Mining Rights Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

14 Jul 2010

The petitioner, Pravinkumar Gosalia, was a mining lessee of certain lands in Quitol Village, Quepem Taluka, Goa. His father had obtained a mining leas...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Partly Allows Insurance Company's Appeal and Claimant's Cross-Objections in Motor Accident Compensation Case — Multiplier Applied as per Second Schedule of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The court modified the multiplier from 15 to 18 for age group 30-35, enhancing compensation from Rs.2,97,000 to Rs.3,42,000.

19 Mar 2013

The case involves an appeal by the National Insurance Company Limited and cross-objections by the claimant K.B. Shivakumar Swamy against the judgment ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates First Appeal Against Dismissal of Suit for Specific Performance. Cross Objection Filed by Defendants Challenges Direction to Repay with Interest.

21 Nov 2015

The matter arose from a suit for specific performance filed by M/s. Gold Touch Real Estate Private Limited, a real estate developer, against six respo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Eviction Decree in Lease Dispute — Lease Not Renewed After Expiry, Tenancy Not Protected Under Rent Act. The court held that a lessee continuing in possession after lease expiry without renewal is not a tenant under the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999, and is liable to vacate.

23 Apr 2015

The case involves a civil revision application challenging concurrent eviction decrees passed by the Small Causes Court and its Appeal Bench. The prop...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Validity of Land Acquisition under Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971 for Non-Compliance with Prior Notice Requirement under Section 13. Petitioners Allege Violation of Natural Justice as Ex-Parte Award Passed Without Proper Service of Notices and Without Following Section 17(5).

14 Oct 2025

The High Court of Bombay heard two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the acquisition of land and a struc...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Erroneous Deduction of Personal Expenses and Incorrect Multiplier Application. The Court held that for a bachelor deceased, deduction of 1/2 towards personal expenses is correct, multiplier should be based on age of deceased (16 for age 25), and 40% future prospects should be added as per Pranay Sethi.

21 Jan 2020

The appeal arises from a judgment and award dated 4.2.2012 passed by the I Addl. Senior Civil Judge and Addl. MACT, Dharwad in MVC No.512/2008. The cl...

High Court

Writ Petition Dismissed on Land Development Rights. A dispute over land acquired for a public bus depot leads to rejection of development claims by private landowners, with the court emphasizing public interest over private rights.

27 Sep 2024

The Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority (MMRDA) along with other respondents, the Bombay High Court dismissed the petition. The Petitione...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Acquiring Body's Application for Leave to Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Acquiring Body Not a Necessary Party Under Section 18 Reference Proceedings. The court held that the Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation, not being a party to the reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, has no locus standi to seek leave to appeal against the award enhancing compensation.

27 Oct 2016

The Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation (VIDC) filed two civil applications seeking leave to appeal against awards passed by the reference Cou...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Railway Contract Dispute — Upholds Claims 1 and 4, Sets Aside Claims 5, 7, and 13 for Lack of Evidence and Non-Application of Mind. The court held that the arbitral tribunal failed to apply its mind to contractual provisions and evidence, rendering the award patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

6 May 2015

The Union of India (petitioner) filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging a majority arbitral award...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Coal Bearing Areas Act Case Over Land Premium Demand. The State Government is entitled to compensation as a 'person interested' under Section 2(d) and deemed lessor under Section 11 of the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957, beyond royalty payable under Section 18(a).

20 Jan 2023

The dispute arose from a demand by the District Magistrate & Collector, Sambalpur, for Rs. 70 lakhs as premium for government land from Mahanadi Coalf...

31 32 33 34 35

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)