Search Results for "Section 20(4)"

1138 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1138 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Proceedings Against Directors in Cheque Dishonour Case — Directors Not in Charge of Company Affairs at Relevant Time. Section 138 NI Act Liability Requires Active Role in Business; Vicarious Liability Not Automatic for All Directors.

The petitioners, Heena Thirumali Sateesh and Hanumanth Inamdar, were directors of Hoysala Projects Private Limited. The respondent, M/s Minimelt Engin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Wife's Revision Petition in Maintenance Case Under Section 125 CrPC — Sets Aside Family Court Order Dismissing Maintenance Claim. Wife Entitled to Maintenance from Husband Despite Earning Capacity, as Husband Failed to Prove Wife's Sufficient Means.

The petitioner, Smt. B. C. Susheela, wife of the respondent Sri. J. Kariyappa, filed a revision petition under Section 19(4) of the Family Courts Act,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Applications Seeking Police Investigation Against Former Mayor and Town Planner in Compensation Dispute. Court Holds That No Cognizable Offence Is Made Out and That the Magistrate's Direction to Treat the Application as a Complaint Was Proper.

The applicant, Atul Ashok Mundada, purchased two agricultural lands in Jalgaon for development. He claimed that the lands were acquired by the Jalgaon...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Considers Criminal Petition Under Section 482 CrPC Seeking Quashing of Private Complaint for Alleged Forgery and Cheating. The Petitioners, Accused Nos. 4 to 6, Alleged that the Complaint Was Civil in Nature and Filed After Unexplained Delay.

The petitioners, accused Nos. 4 to 6 in private complaint P.C.R.No.74 of 2022, filed a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Pro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses MCGM's Challenge to MERC Regulation on Compensation for Delayed Electricity Connections. Regulation 4.10 requiring distribution licensees to pay compensation for failure to provide new connections within stipulated period is valid and not ultra vires the Electricity Act, 2003.

The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM), through its Brihanmumbai Electric Supply & Transport Undertaking (BES&T), filed a writ petition un...