High Court of Karnataka Division Bench Hears Writ Appeal by Government Survey Employees. Appeal Pertains to Service Dispute Arising from Single Judge Order in WA No. 1267 of 2014 (S-RES).
30 May 2024...
Search Results for "Rule 273"
633 result(s) found
Found 633 result(s)
High Court
Karnataka High Court Holds Petition Under Section 482 CrPC Maintainable for In-Laws in Domestic Violence Act Case — No Order Passed by Magistrate, Hence Section 29 Appeal Not Available. In-Laws, Including Senior Citizens and Brother-in-Law, Allowed to Seek Quashing as Proceedings Under Section 12 of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, Could Be Tested Under Inherent Jurisdiction.
28 Jun 2024The matter arose from proceedings initiated by the respondent wife under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 agains...
- 11
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Challenge to Bifurcation and Deemed Conveyance Orders Under Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 and Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963. The petitions were filed by a co-operative housing society against orders that bifurcated the society and granted deemed conveyance to a minority group.
30 Jan 2026The Bombay High Court heard a group of writ petitions filed by Jay Anand Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. against the State of Maharashtra and others...
- 20
High Court
- 30
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Slum Rehabilitation Society in Petition Challenging Notification Subjecting Slum Scheme to Permission Under Maharashtra Restoration of Land to Scheduled Tribe Act, 1974. Slum Act Prevails Over Restoration Act and Section 36A of MLR Code; No Prior Permission Needed Under Restoration Act for Slum Rehabilitation Scheme on Tribal Land.
28 Jul 2016The petitioners, a proposed co-operative housing society of slum dwellers and its chief promoter, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Const...
- 20
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Default Bail Under Section 167(2) CrPC Despite COVID-19 Pandemic — Order Dated 23.03.2020 Does Not Extend Period for Filing Charge Sheet. The right to default bail is indefeasible and cannot be frustrated by the prosecution's failure to file charge sheet within the statutory period.
16 Jun 2020The appellant, S. Kasi, was arrested on 21.02.2020 in Crime No.495 of 2015 under Sections 457, 380, 457(2), 380(2), 411(2), and 414(2) IPC. He was lod...
- 459
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Against Bootlegger Under MPDA Act — Failure to Consider Bail Orders and Inadequate Verification of Witness Statements Renders Detention Invalid. Preventive detention order set aside as detaining authority did not consider bail orders and verification of anonymous witnesses was flawed, violating Article 22(5) of the Constitution.
8 Feb 2024The petitioner, Dhanubai @ Dhanno Yashvant Netlekar, challenged an order dated 31.08.2023 passed by the District Magistrate, Jalgaon, detaining her as...
- 28
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes MAT Order Reinstating Police Officer in Writ Petition by Complainant Lawyer — Suspension Revocation Set Aside Due to Non-Compliance with Maharashtra Police (Punishment and Appeals) Rules, 1956 and Lack of Review Committee Recommendation. The High Court held that the MAT failed to consider mandatory statutory requirements under Rule 4(4) of the 1956 Rules, and the State Government's revocation order was based on a non-existent Review Committee recommendation.
18 Aug 2022The petitioner, a lawyer, filed a complaint against Respondent No. 1, a Superintendent of Police, alleging personal misconduct. Based on the complaint...
- 133
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Upholds Conviction and Sentence Enhancement in Rash Driving Death Case. Concurrent findings of fact based on eyewitness testimony and medical evidence cannot be interfered with in revision; sentence of two months for death by negligence under Section 304(A) IPC enhanced to one year.
21 Apr 2025The petitioner, Gousmodin S/o Abdulrehaman Mulla, was convicted by the Additional Civil Judge & JMFC, Haveri, in C.C.No.687/2012 for offences under Se...
- 36
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Dismissal of Teacher for Misconduct in Minority School — Procedural Compliance Under MEPS Act Not Required for Unauthorized Absence. Termination of a probationary teacher for unauthorized absence and misconduct is valid even without prior approval under Section 5 of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977, as the school is a minority institution and the teacher was on probation.
30 Nov -0001The judgment involves three writ petitions challenging termination of teachers by private schools claiming minority status. The lead petition is by Ra...
- 175
