Search Results for "Master Plan"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...

Search Results for "Master Plan"

435 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 435 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Decrees Recovery of Port Charges in Favor of Chennai Port Trust Against Vessel Owner for Unpaid Berth Hire and Port Dues Under Major Port Trusts Act, 1963. The court held that the statutory charge under Section 64 of the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963 attaches to the vessel and the purchaser is liable for pre-existing dues, and waiver granted to previous owner is not binding on the plaintiff.

23 Jan 2026

The plaintiff, Board of Trustees of the Port of Chennai, filed a suit for recovery of Rs.1,08,84,931/- with interest at 15% per annum from the defenda...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Appeals of Gold Smuggling Accused in Customs Act Case — Confirms Tribunal's Finding of Involvement in Smuggling Conspiracy Based on Documentary Evidence and Circumstantial Links. The court held that the presence of incriminating documents and the modus operandi of using eligible passengers to smuggle gold jewellery established the appellants' involvement in the smuggling network under the Customs Act, 1962.

10 Jan 2025

The case involves 16 Civil Miscellaneous Appeals filed under Section 130(1) of the Customs Act, 1962, challenging a common order dated 24.12.2009 of t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Winding Up Petition Against Varun Global Limited for Non-Payment of Loan Debt. Life Insurance Corporation of India Succeeds in Proving Company's Inability to Pay Debts Under Sections 433(e) and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956.

23 Dec 2016

The petitioner, Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC), filed a company petition under Sections 433(e) and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956, seeking ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Interim Relief in SARFAESI Act Case — Civil Suit Held Not Maintainable Due to Bar Under Section 34 of SARFAESI Act. Borrowers Must Avail Remedy Under Section 17 Before DRT Instead of Seeking Injunction in Civil Court.

27 Sep 2016

The case involves an appeal filed by the appellants, who are borrowers and guarantors, against an order of the Commercial Division of the Bombay High ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Parents Fail to Prove Negligence and Income of Deceased Son. Claim for Compensation Dismissed as Claimants Did Not Establish Rash and Negligent Driving or Deceased's Employment and Income Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

22 Sep 2016

The appellants, K. J. Mohammad and Smt. Saramma, parents of a deceased 22-year-old son, filed a claim petition under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, see...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Suit for Specific Performance and Injunction Against Cooperative Housing Society and Members — No Agreement of Sale Established, Suit Barred by Limitation. The court held that the plaintiff failed to prove any valid agreement for sale of flats, and the suit was time-barred under Article 54 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

10 Nov 2014

The plaintiff, Vardhaman Developers Limited, filed a suit for specific performance of an alleged oral agreement for sale of flats in a cooperative hou...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Petition Under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Despite Unstamped MOU. Stamp Objection Is for Arbitral Tribunal to Decide, Not a Bar to Appointment of Arbitrator.

22 Aug 2014

The applicants, Nilesh Shantilal Tank and Praful Shantilal Tank, filed an arbitration petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Section 9 Order Due to Insufficiently Stamped MOU. Application Under Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Held Not Maintainable as Underlying Agreement Was Insufficiently Stamped Under Section 35 of Bombay Stamp Act, 1958.

22 Aug 2014

The appeal arose from an order dated 30 August 2013 passed by the learned Principal District Judge, Thane, allowing an application filed by the respon...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Section 9 Petition in Development Dispute — Directs Deposit of Rs.12.5 Crores and Appointment of Court Receiver. Clause 6 of MOU for Refund on Default Forms Basis for Interim Relief Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

29 Apr 2013

The petitioners, four individuals, entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the respondent, a developer, on 29 July 2011 for development ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Advertising Contract Dispute — Petitioner's Challenge Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Fails. Court Held That Arbitrator's Findings on Breach and Quantum Were Not Patently Illegal or Against Public Policy.

8 Jan 2013

The petitioner, M/s Maneesh Pharmaceuticals Limited, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an ar...

31 32 33 34 35

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)