Search Results for "Excise Commissioner"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Excise Commissioner"

1610 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1610 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Retrospective Levy of Supervision Costs Under Bombay Prohibition Act. Retrospective Recovery of Supervision Costs from Liquor Licensee Quashed as Without Statutory Authority Under Section 58A of Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949.

24 Feb 2015

The petitioner, M/s. Vidarbha Liquor Corporation, a partnership firm holding a liquor license, challenged the retrospective levy and recovery of super...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Orders Rejecting Condonation of Delay in Customs and Central Excise Appeals; Directs Fresh Consideration. Appellate Authorities Failed to Exclude Time Taken in Prosecuting Writ Petitions Before Filing Statutory Appeals, as Required Under Section 14(2) of Limitation Act, 1963.

24 Dec 2014

The judgment arises from two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court. The lead petition, WP N...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Petition of IRS Officer Challenging Disciplinary Proceedings in Contraband Silver Seizure Case. Petitioner's claim of prior information from informer disbelieved; charge of malafide intention to appropriate reward upheld.

10 Feb 2023

The petitioner, D.S. Karant, a 1969 batch Indian Revenue Service officer, was posted as Additional Commissioner at Mangalore. He claimed to have recei...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Declares Rule 5 of Hot Re-rolling Mills Annual Capacity Determination Rules, 1997 as Ultra Vires in Central Excise Matter — Rule Held to Be Without Authority of Law and Unenforceable. The court quashed determination orders based on the impugned rule, directing respondents not to give effect to the rule or orders.

17 Mar 2015

The petitioner, Bhualka Steel Industries Limited and its Chairman, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India chall...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Challenge to Rule 5 of Hot Re-rolling Mills Annual Capacity Determination Rules, 1997 by Steel Company. Rule 5 held valid and intra vires the Central Excise Act, 1944, and determination orders upheld.

17 Mar 2015

The petitioners, Bhuwalka Steel Industries Limited and its Chairman & Managing Director, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Const...

High Court

High Court of Bombay hears writ petition challenging constitutional validity of Section 48(5) of MVAT Act, 2002 on input tax credit set-off — Petitioner seeks reading down of 'actually paid' to 'ought to have been paid'

11 May 2012

The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed by a partnership firm registered as a dealer under the Maharashtra Value Ad...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Quashes Endorsement Rejecting SVLDRS Payment, Holds Limitation Extended Due to COVID-19 Supreme Court Orders. Payment made on 30.09.2020 under Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019, beyond notified deadline of 30.06.2020, held valid as Supreme Court took suo motu cognizance and extended limitation for all proceedings from 15.03.2020 till further orders.

20 Aug 2024

The writ petition was filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking quashing of an endorsement dated 13.01.2022 and a directio...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Central Excise Case Due to Non-Compliance with Tribunal's Direction to Furnish Document — Violation of Natural Justice. CESTAT's Order Directing Supply of Letter Dated 20.01.2001 Was Final and Could Not Be Modified Without Proper Justification.

25 Apr 2024

The appellant, a manufacturer of cotton yarn and polyester yarn, was issued two show cause notices dated 11.05.2001 and 02.11.2001 alleging excess sto...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Commissioner's Order Due to Availability of Alternative Statutory Appeal; Mandatory Pre-deposit Under Section 35F Central Excise Act Not Waivable on Grounds of Financial Hardship.

3 Aug 2017

The writ petition arose from an order dated 22.11.2016 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs, Belapur Commissionerate, which the pe...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Central Excise Case — Appellant Entitled to Cenvat Credit on Input Services. Definition of 'Input Service' Under Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 is Broad and Includes Services Having Nexus with Manufacturing Business.

21 Apr 2021

The appellant, Toyota Kirloskar Motor Private Limited, is a manufacturer of motor vehicles and parts, registered under the Central Excise Act. It file...

31 32 33 34 35

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)