KAHC010366622012_1
21 Jun 2016...
Search Results for "industrial jurisprudence"
500 result(s) found
Found 500 result(s)
High Court
- 57
High Court
- 20
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Disciplinary Entrustment Orders Passed Against BBMP Employees After Acquittal in Bribery Cases. Court Finds Government Failed to Apply Mind Under Section 12(4) of Karnataka Lokayukta Act, 1984 and There Was Inordinate Delay in Initiating Proceedings.
12 Nov 2020The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru adjudicated two writ petitions filed by BBMP employees, K.S. Nanjegowda and N.G. Nataraj, who challenged gove...
- 27
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Government Order on Health Department as Arbitrary. The Petitions Invoke Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India to Quash the Order Dated 14.05.2025 for Violation of Natural Justice and Fundamental Rights.
10 Dec 2025The petitioners, including Jagadeesha Moger and others, filed a series of writ petitions before the High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, under Arti...
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Hears CBI's Appeal Against Acquittal in British Minor's Death Case; Trial Court Found CBI Investigation Invalid Without Proper Authorization. The trial court held that the CBI chargesheet was a fresh one and not a supplementary chargesheet, and that no notification empowered the CBI to register a new FIR in Mumbai.
17 Jul 2019The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) filed an appeal under Section 378(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, against the judgment and order...
- 13
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Validity of Mysore (Personal and Miscellaneous) Inams Abolition Act, 1954 as Protected by Article 31A. The Act's Acquisition of Inam Estates Without Provision for Just Equivalent Compensation Did Not Violate Article 31(2) Because It Effected Agrarian Reform Extinguishing Intermediary Rights.
4 Dec 1968The case involved a constitutional challenge by the petitioners, inamdars of two villages in Mysore, against the Mysore (Personal and Miscellaneous) I...
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Heard Constitutional Challenge to Section 31-A of the NDPS Act, 1985, Imposing Mandatory Death Penalty for Repeat Drug Offences. The petition questioned whether mandatory death penalty for non-homicidal drug offences under Section 31-A violates fundamental rights under Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India.
16 Jun 2011The matter involved two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the constitutional validity of Section 31-A of the Narc...
High Court
Bombay High Court Directs MHADA to Pay Compensation for Land Acquired 36 Years Ago Without Award — Violation of Articles 14, 21, and 300-A of the Constitution. Non-payment of compensation for compulsory acquisition under Section 93(5) of the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976, held arbitrary and unconstitutional; court orders payment with interest at 9% per annum from date of possession.
1 Aug 2024The petitioner, Yusuf Yunus Kantharia, was the owner of a plot of land measuring 979 sq. metres in Dharavi, Mumbai, along with a chawl known as Kantha...
- 1036
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Refers to Larger Bench the Question Whether Mere Membership of a Banned Organization is Punishable Under Section 10 of UAPA, 1967 — Earlier Decisions in Arup Bhuyan and Raneef Holding That Mere Membership Does Not Incriminate Without Violence or Incitement Are Reconsidered as Union of India Was Not Heard.
24 Mar 2023This judgment arises from a reference to a larger Bench of the Supreme Court of India, questioning the correctness of the decisions in Arup Bhuyan v. ...
- 364
