Search Results for "compounded"

385 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 385 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Building Construction Permissions as Barred by Res Judicata and Laches. The Court held that the petitioners had previously litigated the same issues and obtained no relief, and the PIL was filed after substantial construction had already been completed.

The Altamount Road Area Citizens Committee and another petitioner filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) before the Bombay High Court challenging th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness. Conviction under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as sole interested witness's testimony lacked corroboration.

The appellant, Pravinbhai Ambalal Shah, was convicted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge & Special Judge, Kheda at Nadiad in Special Case No. 5 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Acquits Accused in SC/ST Act Case Due to Lack of Public View Element. Caste-Based Insult Allegation Fails as Incident Occurred Inside a Shop, Not in Public View Under Section 3(1)(x) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

The appellant, Pinakinbhai Ravindrakumar Shukla, was convicted by the learned Additional District Judge and Presiding Officer, 2nd Fast Track Court, K...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Regular Second Appeal in Money Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Appellant failed to establish substantial question of law regarding loan transaction and repayment.

The appellant, Sri M M Deverajgowda, filed a Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the judgment an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Time Limit for Availing Input Tax Credit Under Section 16(4) of CGST Act. The court held that the time limit is mandatory and not directory, and retrospective amendments are valid.

The Bombay High Court, in a batch of writ petitions, addressed the constitutional validity and interpretation of Section 16(4) of the Central Goods an...