Search Results for "approval order"

8695 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 8695 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds State's 2011 Pay Scale Order, Settles Long-Standing Litigation. Court Affirms Doctrine of Merger, Ensures Fair Compensation for Retired Employees, and Provides Finality to Pay Discrepancy Dispute

The Supreme Court of India adjudicated a protracted litigation involving the State of Uttar Pradesh and its employees regarding the implementation of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind. Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based on Mere Criminal Antecedents Without Evidence of Public Order Disturbance.

The petitioner, Ashok Kisan Jadhav, challenged his detention under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug-...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Appeal Against Discharge of Accused in MCOCA Case Due to Invalid Sanction. Sanction Under Section 23(2) MCOCA Found to Be Without Application of Mind, Leading to Discharge of All Accused.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against an order dated 8th August 2014 passed by the Special Judge under the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses State's Petition Against SSRD Orders in Land Regularization Case. SSRD's Directions for Regularization Based on Auction Price Upheld as Within Jurisdiction Under Rule 108(6) of Gujarat Land Revenue Rules, 1972.

The dispute originated from the allotment of government land in 1967 to M/s. Nav Bharat Potteries Ltd. for a pottery industry at a concessional rate, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Stamp Duty Reassessment Order Due to Violation of Natural Justice and Non-Application of Mind. Collector's order set aside for failing to consider petitioner's objections and relying on unsubstantiated ready reckoner rates without providing opportunity of hearing.

The petitioner, Crystal Construction Company, challenged an order dated 16 September 2021 passed by the Collector of Stamps, Andheri, which adjudicate...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Non-Application of Mind to Bail Conditions. Failure to Consider Petitioner's Release on Bail in Criminal Case Rendered Detention Order Invalid.

The petitioner, Nasir Ismail Mujavar, challenged a detention order dated 3 February 2012 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Mumbai, under the Mahar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Dismissal Order of Police Officer for Violation of Article 311(2) Safeguards - Dismissal Without Departmental Inquiry Held Illegal as Reasons for Dispensing with Inquiry Were Insufficient and Not Supported by Concrete Evidence.

The appeal arose from the dismissal of a police officer from service without conducting a departmental inquiry, invoking clause (b) of the second prov...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Appeals Against Company Law Board Order Directing Buyout of Majority Stake in Wind Energy Company. The majority shareholder challenged the finding of oppression and the forced sale of shares to minority shareholders under sections 397, 402 and 403 of the Companies Act, 1956.

The proceedings arose from disputes between the shareholders of Enercon (India) Limited, now known as Wind World (India) Limited, a company engaged in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Issues Rule in Writ Petition Challenging Orders Restricting Redevelopment of Cooperative Society under PWR-219 Scheme. Court frames issues regarding requirement of prior permission from Social Welfare Department for redevelopment using additional FSI/TDR.

The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed by a co-operative housing society challenging orders dated 8 June 2016 and ...