SUIT (L) NO. 204 OF 2017.
16 Jun 2017...
Search Results for "Section 14(2) maintainability"
319 result(s) found
Found 319 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Considers Whether an Ex Parte Decree that is Set Aside Later Qualifies as a Decree of Court of First Instance in Preemption Cases. The Court examined the impact of the Haryana amendment to Section 15 of the Punjab Preemption Act, 1913, which removed the preemption right of cosharers, on pending proceedings.
1 Jan 1970The case involved a dispute over preemption rights under the Punjab Preemption Act, 1913. The appellant, Vijay Singh, a cosharer, filed a suit for pos...
- 22
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Rules that Setting Aside Ex Parte Decree Means Fresh Decree is Decree of First Instance for Pre-emption Rights. Pre-emptor's Right Must Exist on Date of Fresh Decree Under Section 15, Punjab Pre-emption Act, 1913.
31 Jul 2026The case arose from a suit for possession based on the right of pre-emption under the Punjab Pre-emption Act, 1913. The appellant, Vijay Singh, a cosh...
- 26
High Court
- 47
High Court
Court Quashes Decade-Old Show Cause Notices Due to Procedural Delays. Non-communication of transfer to call book and prolonged delay in adjudication render ICICI Bank subsidiary's show cause notices invalid.
11 Jun 2024The petitioner, a wholly owned subsidiary of ICICI Bank Limited, sought a declaration from the court that the proceedings initiated by two show cause ...
- 416
High Court
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Suit for declaration of ownership and injunction dismissed as appellants failed to prove title and possession over disputed property.
30 Nov -0001The case involves a second appeal filed by the appellants (original plaintiffs) against the judgment and decree of the first appellate court, which ha...
- 120
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Customs Duty Demand for Goods Imported at Different Port. Commissioner of Customs, Bombay lacks jurisdiction to demand duty for goods imported at New Delhi under an advance licence after change of port of registration.
14 Oct 2005The petitioner, Vimal Nath, carrying on business as M/s Sharika Intl, was issued an advance licence on 16/2/1994 by licensing authorities at Delhi per...
- 125
High Court
Gujarat High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint in Property Suit — Suit Barred by Limitation and Res Judicata. Order VII Rule 11 CPC Application Allowed as Plaint Discloses No Cause of Action and is Time-Barred.
19 Jan 2026The present appeal was filed by the original plaintiff against the order of the trial court dated 01.10.2025 rejecting the plaint in Special Civil Sui...
- 249
