Search Results for "Margin Money"

353 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 353 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Confession. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt based on circumstantial evidence and extra-judicial confession.

The appellant, Saraswati Landge, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Ambajogai, for the murder of her husband Ganpat Landge under Section ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in CBI Corruption Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Invalid Sanction. Conviction under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance of bribe beyond reasonable doubt.

The case pertains to two criminal appeals filed by Vilas Vasudev Kunkolienkar (A1) and his wife Vijayshree Vilas Kunkolienkar (A3) challenging their c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Benefit of Doubt on Juvenile Status and Inconsistent Evidence. Claim of juvenility at time of offence not properly considered; conviction under Sections 302, 307 read with 34 IPC set aside.

The appellant, Channappa, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Yadgir, in S.C. No. 40/2012 for offences punishable under Sections 307, 302 read with 3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Culpable Homicide Not Amounting to Murder in Family Dispute Over Water Rights. Appellant convicted under Section 304 Part-II IPC for causing death of niece by two stick blows on head during quarrel.

The appellant, Shaikh Chand, was convicted by the IInd Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad in Sessions Case No. 114 of 1996 for the offence punishab...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Quashing Reopening of Assessment Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Year 2004-05. Mere Change of Opinion Cannot Justify Reopening When All Material Facts Were Disclosed During Original Assessment Under Section 143(3).

The petitioner, Shri Mahila Griha Udyog Lijjat Papad, a society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1960 and the Bombay Public Trust Act,...