Search Results for "Maharashtra Development Service"

3146 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3146 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010159832015_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Disposes of Batch of Writ Petitions Regarding Encroachments and Treats One as PIL to Monitor Supreme Court Directions. The Court Issued Rule and Heard Matters Finally, but the Complete Order and Findings Were Not Available in the Judgment Excerpt.

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, heard a batch of writ petitions filed by various religious trusts and societies against the Stat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Validity of Eviction Notices under Slum Act in Slum Rehabilitation Dispute. Petitioners Challenged Eviction Notices Issued under Sections 33 and 38 of Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971, Alleging Lack of Section 3C(1) Declaration.

The matter arose from a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by Om-Sai Darshan Cooperative Housing Society (Proposed) an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Petitions for Deemed Lapse of Land Reservations under MRTP Act. Court Considers Whether Purchase Notices Served on Appropriate Authority Under Section 49 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 Were Valid.

The two writ petitions were filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a declaration that the reservations imposed on the petitioner...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Challenge to Caste Certificate Invalidation Under Maharashtra Act 23 of 2001. Petitioner Raises Issues of Committee Constitution and Affinity Test Inadequacy Against Scrutiny Committee Order.

The matter involved a challenge to the Caste Scrutiny Committee's order invalidating the petitioner's claim to belong to the Halba Scheduled Tribe und...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Compromise Between Plaintiffs and Defendant Nos.8-11 in Property Suit — Consent Terms Accepted Despite Objections from Other Defendants. Partial Settlement Under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC Does Not Affect Rights of Non-Settling Defendants Who May Continue to Contest the Suit.

The suit was filed by 35 plaintiffs seeking a declaration that they are purchasers of certain property. The matter was listed for settlement as the pl...