Search Results for "Gujarat High Court Rules"

2509 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2509 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Challenging Minimum Qualifying Marks in Judicial Appointments: Upholding Constitutional Integrity Exploring the Constitutionality of Viva Voce Criteria in Bihar and Gujarat District Judiciary Selection Processes

The constitutionality of rules prescribing minimum qualifying marks in the viva voce test for appointments to the District Judiciary in Bihar and Guja...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Hears Appeal Against Dismissal of Suit for Injunction Under Section 96 CPC; Appeal Filed by Purchaser Under Agreement to Sell. Trial Court Had Dismissed Suit for Lack of Title and Non-Joinder of Parties Despite Long Possession Claim.

The dispute concerned a suit property being Final Plot No.129 of Town Planning Scheme No.22, Paldi, Ahmedabad, admeasuring 1204 square yards after exc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Arbitral Tribunal's Jurisdictional Order as Not Maintainable. Remedy Lies Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 After Final Award.

The petitioner, Tirupati Shopping Centre Premises Co-op. Society Limited, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of Indi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sanctions Scheme of Arrangement in Company Petition for Revival of Sick Pharmaceutical Company. Scheme under Section 391 of Companies Act, 1956, Approved Involving Settlement of Secured Creditors' Dues through Cash and Securities.

The Pharmaceutical Products of India Limited (PPIL), a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, filed two company petitions under Section 3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Case by Restoring Arbitral Award. High Court's Setting Aside of Award Under Section 37(1)(c) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Found Erroneous as It Exceeded Scope of Judicial Review.

The Supreme Court of India heard a civil appeal arising from a dispute between PSA Sical Terminals Pvt. Ltd., the appellant, and The Board of Trustees...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Admission of Winding-Up Petition Against Telecom Company Due to Substratum Erosion and Deadlock. Cancellation of 2G Licences and Irreconcilable Differences Between Equal Shareholders Justify Winding-Up Under Section 433(f) of the Companies Act, 1956.

The appeal arose from an order of the company judge admitting a petition for winding up of Etisalat D.B. Telecom Limited (the company) under Section 4...