Search Results for "Civil Procedure Code, 1908"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Civil Procedure Code, 1908"

5017 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5017 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Declaration of Title and Possession in Property Dispute Between Brothers. Consent Decree and Subsequent Transfers Bar Reopening of Title Under Section 9A CPC.

18 Oct 2013

The plaintiff, Naresh Lachmandas Aswani, filed a suit against his brother Haridas (defendant no.1) and two companies (defendant nos.2 and 3) seeking a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition to Return Plaint for Lack of Jurisdiction in Summary Suit for Recovery of Money. Court holds that cause of action arose outside Mumbai and City Civil Court lacked territorial jurisdiction under Section 16 CPC.

10 Mar 2015

The petitioner, Naran Lala Pvt. Ltd., a company based in Navsari, Gujarat, challenged an order dated 25.11.2014 passed by the City Civil Court at Bomb...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Civil Court Cannot Regularise Encroachment on Forest Land in Contravention of Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 — Government Resolution of 1979 Cannot Override Section 2 of the Act.

17 Jan 2013

This is a reference made by the Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, Kannad under Section 113 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking answers to ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Holds Unilateral Appointment of Arbitrators Violates Equality Principle Under Section 18 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Party Autonomy Cannot Override Mandatory Requirement of Independence and Impartiality, and Unilateral Appointment Clauses in Public-Private Contracts Are Unconscionable and Void.

13 Nov 2024

The Supreme Court of India, in a Constitution Bench judgment, addressed the validity of unilateral appointment of arbitrators under the Arbitration an...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Trust Dispute — Upholds Concurrent Findings on Validity of Consent Decree. Court holds that a consent decree passed in a suit for administration of trust is not null and void and can be challenged only on grounds of fraud or collusion, which were not established.

8 Jan 2014

The original plaintiff, Sushilabai Byramji, filed Regular Civil Suit No.63 of 1982 seeking rendition of accounts, execution of trusts, setting aside o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenants' Petition Against Dismissal of Application to Set Aside Decree in Eviction Suit. Decree Passed Not Ex-Parte but Under Order XVII Rule 2 CPC, as Defendants Had Appeared Earlier and Failed to Appear at Subsequent Hearings Without Sufficient Cause.

17 Nov 2025

The dispute arose from an eviction suit filed by Kshtriya Dnyati Sabha, a registered public trust under the Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950, against the...

High Court

Supreme Court Upholds Financial Creditor in Insolvency Petition Based on Balance Sheet Acknowledgement Under Limitation Act. The Court held that entries in signed balance sheets constitute acknowledgement of debt under Section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963, extending the limitation period for applications under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, and that defects in the application regarding the date of default are curable.

15 Apr 2021

The dispute arose from an application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) filed by Asset Reconstruction Company (India) ...

High Court

Parsi Chief Matrimonial Court Holds That Evidence in Parsi Divorce Suits May Be Recorded Before a Commissioner Under CPC Order 18 Rule 4(2) — Section 46 of Parsi Marriage & Divorce Act, 1936 Does Not Mandate In-Court Recording with Delegates.

3 Apr 2014

The case involved a suit filed under the Parsi Marriage & Divorce Act, 1936, by Rohinton Panthaky against Armin R. Panthaky. During the proceedings, a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Will Dispute, Upholds 1935 Will Over 1988 Will. Succession rights determined by earlier valid Will; later Will found illegal and not binding on plaintiffs.

13 Oct 2016

The case involves a property dispute over premises situated at CTS No.212, Nana Peth, Pune. The respondents (original plaintiffs) filed Special Civil ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Assessee in Income Tax Act Case Due to Arbitrary Stay Provision. The Third Proviso to Section 254(2A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, Was Struck Down as It Automatically Vacated Stay Orders After 365 Days Without Considering Assessee's Responsibility for Delay, Violating Article 14 of the Constitution of India.

6 Apr 2021

The Supreme Court of India addressed a batch of civil appeals concerning the constitutional validity of the third proviso to Section 254(2A) of the In...

30 31 32 33 34

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)