Search Results for "discovery statement"

1352 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1352 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Death Sentence in Confirmation Case for Kidnap, Rape and Murder of 5-Year-Old Girl — Circumstantial Evidence Proved Guilt. Conviction Under IPC Sections 302, 363, 376(2)(f), and 201 Based on Last Seen, Preparation, and Medical Evidence Held Unassailable.

The case arose from the kidnap, rape, and murder of a five-year-old girl, Chakuli, in Nerli village, Kolhapur district, on the night of 24 October 200...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Appeals Against Conviction for Rape and Murder and State\u2019s Appeals for Enhancement and Against Acquittal. Court Considers Circumstantial Evidence Linking Accused to Offences Under Sections 302, 376, 392, 201, 411, 414 IPC and Others.

Criminal Appeal No. 516 of 2012 was filed by accused Jawedkhan @ Tingrya against his conviction and sentence. Criminal Appeal No. 281 of 2012 and Crim...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Reconsiders Appellant’s Murder Conviction Based on Circumstantial Evidence; Handwriting Expert Opinion Under Scrutiny. Conviction of Appellant for Murder Under Section 302 IPC Challenged on Grounds That Chain of Circumstances Incomplete and Expert Evidence Not Corroborated.

The appellant, Vikas Ramdas Khairnar Patil, preferred a criminal appeal before the Bombay High Court against his conviction and life imprisonment for ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Conclusive Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302 and 201 IPC Set Aside as Motive Not Proved and Last Seen Theory Not Established.

The appellant, Suresh Sominath Pawar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Vaijapur, for the murder of Anil under Sections 302 and 201 IPC....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Eye Witness and Lack of Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as sole eye witness was found to be planted and not credible.

The appellants, Waghya alias Manoj Bhaiyalal Uke and Sandip s/o Bhaiyalal Uke, were convicted by the Sessions Judge, Wardha, for the murder of Pintu u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Step-father for Murder of Step-son Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302 and 201 IPC sustained as prosecution established motive, last seen, recovery of incriminating articles, and medical evidence.

The appellant, Sikandar alias Raju Vajir Inamdar, was convicted by the II Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, for the murder of his step-son Jayku...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder in Ganpati Immersion Day Assault — Life Sentence Confirmed Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Dying Declaration. Motive of Job Loss and Threat to Kill Established Chain of Circumstances Leading to Guilt Under Section 302 IPC.

The appellant, Chandrakant Bapu Nawale, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Ratnagiri, for the murder of Kashinath Keshav Nawale under Sec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Witnesses and Inconsistent Medical Evidence. Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 302, 307, 452, 504, 506, 143, 147, 148, 149 of IPC.

The appellant, Abdul Rauf Abdul Razzak, filed an appeal against the judgment and order of acquittal dated 17-11-2008 passed by the learned Ad-hoc Addi...