Search Results for "carry forward loss"

366 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 366 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 34 Challenge to Arbitral Award in Partnership Dispute — Upholds Award of Rs. 7.39 Crore with Interest. Limitation plea rejected as claim was within time; quantification not perverse.

The judgment concerns a Commercial Arbitration Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Arbitration Application and Petition for Interim Measures in Partnership Dispute Over Commercial Project. No Arbitration Agreement Found in Memorandum of Understanding Dated 16 October 2017 Under Sections 9 and 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Thus Relief Denied.

The dispute arose from a partnership firm, Respondents, involved in developing 'Ventura Commercial Hub'. The petitioner, was admitted as a partner in ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Order Striking Off Defence in Easement Suit — Inquiry Required Before Penalty Under Order XXXIX Rule 2A CPC. The court held that striking off defence is a harsh order and can only be passed after an inquiry establishing wilful disobedience of an injunction order.

The appellants, original defendants in a suit for easementary rights, challenged an order of the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Quepem dated 16.9.2020,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Refers Kerala's Challenge to Union's Borrowing Ceiling to Constitution Bench — Raises Substantial Questions on Interpretation of Article 293 and Federal Fiscal Powers. The Court declined interim relief pending reference, noting the mandatory nature of the injunction sought.

The State of Kerala instituted an original suit under Article 131 of the Constitution of India against the Union of India, challenging three actions: ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Challenge to Government's Power to Nominate University Syndicate Members Under Karnataka State Universities Act, 2000. Section 39(1) Held Valid and Not Ultra Vires Sections 28(g) and 38 of the Act.

The case involves a batch of writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the validity of Section 39(1) of...