Search Results for "Section 221 Contract Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Section 221 Contract Act"

307 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 307 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Yum! Restaurants (Marketing) Private Limited in Doctrine of Mutuality Case — Surplus from AMP Activities Held Taxable as Income. Contributions from Non-Beneficiaries and Lack of Complete Identity Between Contributors and Beneficiaries Defeats Claim of Mutuality Under Income Tax Act, 1961.

24 Apr 2020

The appeal arose from a dispute between Yum! Restaurants (Marketing) Private Limited (YRMPL), a wholly owned subsidiary of Yum! Restaurants (India) Pv...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Summons for Judgment in Summary Suit for Recovery of Debenture and Deposit Amounts — Acknowledgment of Liability Found in Correspondence. Evidentiary Value of Letters as Acknowledgment Under Section 18 of Limitation Act, 1963, Upheld to Extend Limitation Period.

14 Jan 2010

The Bombay High Court heard a Summons for Judgment in a summary suit filed by Canara Bank and others, as trustees of Canbank Mutual Fund, a trust unde...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Bench Hears Letters Patent Appeals Challenging Dismissal of Management's Writ Petition in Employee Seniority Dispute. The Appeals Were Admitted and Heard Finally With Consent of Parties.

26 Feb 2014

The Letters Patent Appeals arose from the dismissal of a writ petition by a Single Judge. The appellant management, an educational institution managin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition to Quash FIR in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — Notice Not Served at Correct Address. The court held that proper service of demand notice is mandatory and failure to serve at correct address vitiates proceedings.

18 Sep 2025

The petitioner, Abid Shiraz Merchant, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court seeking quashi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Petition Challenging Industrial Tribunal Award on Wage Parity for Mumbai Workers. Court holds that Tribunal erred in granting wage parity between Mumbai and Taloja units without considering financial capacity and other relevant factors under Section 10 of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

25 Jul 2019

The case involves two writ petitions arising from an award of the Industrial Tribunal in a wage dispute between VVF Limited Employees' Union (the Unio...

High Court

High Court of Madras Quashes Ex-Parte Compromise Decree? – Revision Petitions Challenge Validity Under Order XXIII CPC. Alleged settlement decree in property suits passed without hearing all parties violated procedural safeguards of Order XXIII of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

13 Mar 2026

The two Civil Revision Petitions under Article 227 of the Constitution of India were filed against the common judgment and decree dated 11.12.2024 in ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition Challenging Impleading of Legal Representatives in Suit for Specific Performance. Order Allowing Substitution Under Order 22 CPC Upheld as Proper Exercise of Discretion.

26 Aug 2014

The petitioners, who were not parties to the original suit, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging a...

29 30 31

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)