Search Results for "Bombay Tenancy Act, 1948"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Bombay Tenancy Act, 1948"

390 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 390 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Application, Rejects Suit Plaint for Injunction Based on Unregistered Agreement for Sale. Suit for perpetual injunction filed by plaintiff claiming possession under an unregistered agreement for sale without title is not maintainable and barred under Section 41(h) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963.

27 Aug 2024

The case involves a Civil Revision Application filed by the defendants (revision applicants) against an order of the Trial Court rejecting their appli...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Land Title Dispute — Concurrent Findings Upheld. Patta Validity Requires Proof of Abandonment or Revocation of Earlier Patta Under Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code.

9 Apr 2019

The Supreme Court dismissed an appeal arising from a land title dispute in Madhya Pradesh. The respondents-plaintiffs (Shiv Nath and deceased Vishwana...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition by Port Trust Against Sub-Tenant — Eviction Order Restored Under Public Premises Act. Sub-tenant cannot claim protection under Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act as premises are governed by the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971.

8 Jun 2026

The petitioner, the Board of Trustees of the Port of Mumbai (a statutory corporation), filed a writ petition challenging an order of the City Civil Co...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Partition Suit — Upholds Concurrent Findings of Courts Below. The Court held that the appellant-defendant failed to prove exclusive title by adverse possession and that the suit was not barred by limitation under Article 65 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

6 Jan 2016

The dispute pertains to a suit for partition and separate possession of agricultural lands filed by the original plaintiff (respondent no.1) against t...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Central Council for Research in Ayurvedic Sciences in Service Matter — Retirement Age Enhancement Not Applicable to Autonomous Body Employees. The Court held that the Cabinet decision to enhance superannuation age to 65 years for AYUSH doctors was limited to those directly under the Ministry of AYUSH and CGHS, and did not extend to employees of autonomous bodies like CCRAS.

1 Jan 2023

The case involves an appeal by the Central Council for Research in Ayurvedic Sciences (CCRAS) and its Director General against the judgment of the Ori...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR Against Public Servant in Lokayukta Case for Lack of Sanction Under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Criminal proceedings initiated without prior sanction from competent authority are void ab initio and cannot be sustained.

7 Apr 2016

The petitioner, Mr. Thimmaiah, was arrayed as accused No.1 in Crime No.80/2015 registered by the Lokayukta Police, Bangalore Urban Division, for offen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging MRT Order in Tenancy Revision — Suo Moto Revision Barred by Limitation and Lack of Jurisdiction Under Section 76A of Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948. The Additional Collector lacked jurisdiction to revise an order of the Sub Divisional Officer beyond one year and under a provision applicable only to Mamlatdar or Tribunal orders.

6 Feb 2015

The petitioner, Rajaram S. Patil, challenged an order dated 22 November 2013 of the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal (MRT) which had set aside an order da...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Landlord's Petition in Tenancy Purchase Dispute — Section 32-F(1A) of Bombay Tenancy & Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 Not Applicable as Landlord Attained Majority Before Its Introduction. Tenant's Intimation of Purchase Sent After Landlord Attained Majority Held Invalid, Landlord Entitled to Terminate Tenancy.

12 Jan 2005

The petitioner, a landlord, challenged the order of the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal dated 14th September 1990, which had allowed the tenant's revisio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Land Dispute — No Jurisdictional Error Found in Revenue Authorities' Orders Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code. The court upheld the concurrent findings of possession recorded by the Sub-Divisional Officer and the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal under Sections 145 and 147 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966, as the findings were based on evidence and not vitiated by any error of law.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, who were the original applicants before the revenue authorities, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Lower Courts' Rejection of Exemption Pleading Challenge in Eviction Case — Statutory Exemption from Rent Control Order Does Not Require Pleading. Successor-in-interest of Janpad Sabha Need Not Plead Statutory Exemption Under Notification Dated 26.7.1949 As It Is A Matter Of Law.

23 Dec 2011

The Zilla Parishad, Nagpur, as the owner of a plot admeasuring 100 ft x 100 ft in the compound of the former Janpad Sabha, filed a suit for eviction a...

29 30 31 32 33

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)