High Court of Judicature at Bombay Allows Appeals in Land Acquisition Cases Under National Highways Act, 1956. The Court Enhanced Compensation for Landowners and Directed Authorities to Pay Additional Amounts.
9 Jun 2025...
Search Results for "Article 16(3)"
369 result(s) found
Found 369 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Review Petition in Property Dispute — Second Appeal Under Section 41 of Punjab Courts Act, 1918 Does Not Require Substantial Question of Law. The Court restored the High Court's judgment after finding that the original judgment erroneously applied Section 100 CPC instead of Section 41 of the Punjab Act.
16 May 2024The petitioner filed a review petition seeking review of an order dated 13.03.2019 in Civil Appeal No. 6567 of 2014, wherein the Supreme Court had all...
- 318
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Father's Appeal in Child Custody Dispute, Restores Family Court's Order Granting Permanent Custody. The Court held that the High Court erred in substituting a shared custody arrangement without adequate consideration of the children's welfare under the Guardian and Wards Act, 1890.
8 May 2024The case involves a custody dispute between a Colonel in the Indian Armed Forces (appellant) and his wife, a teacher (respondent), over their two mino...
- 1117
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Termination of Temporary Employees in Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation. Petitioners, appointed as temporary employees, were terminated without notice; court held that temporary employees have no right to the post and termination in accordance with contract terms is valid.
22 Jan 2018The petitioners, fifteen individuals, were appointed as temporary employees by the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) for a fixed period or unti...
- 45
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Parole to Life Convict for Medical Treatment of Mother and Sister. Parole Granted Under Maharashtra Prison Rules Despite Adverse Police Report, Subject to Conditions.
12 Oct 2017The petitioner, Milind @ Manoj @ Sharukh Khan Mahadu Thorat, a convict serving life imprisonment in Central Prison, Aurangabad, filed a Criminal Writ ...
- 48
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Remission to Convict Under Government Circular Despite Non-Applicability of Probation of Offenders Act. Petitioner convicted under Section 376 IPC and Section 3(1)(xii) of SC/ST Act granted two years remission based on Government Circular dated 6th August 1997.
12 Oct 2017The petitioner, Mohd. Ali s/o Mohd. Habib Shaikh, was a convict lodged in Open Prison, Paithan, serving sentence for offences under Section 376 of the...
- 111
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Four Accused in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence. The court held that the prosecution successfully proved the conspiracy and murder beyond reasonable doubt, relying on motive, last seen, and recovery of weapons.
18 Aug 2017The case pertains to the murder of a young girl, Monika Dashrath Kirnapure, on 11.03.2011 near KDK College, Nagpur. The appellants, Krunal Jaiswal, Pr...
- 48
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Life Convict's Petition for Remission of 2 Years Under Government Circular Dated 6th August, 1997. Government Circular Applies to All Convicts Including Those Under Section 302 IPC, Court Directs State to Grant Remission.
27 Mar 2017The petitioner, Nandkumar s/o Shivmurti Mundhe, a life convict undergoing sentence at Harsool Jail, Aurangabad, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under A...
- 39
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Land Acquisition Challenge for Malaprabha Project Due to Delay and Laches. Petitioners' challenge to Section 4(1) and Section 6(1) notifications under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 dismissed as they failed to explain delay of over 4 years.
6 Oct 2015The petitioners, 26 individuals from Gonnagar Village, Ramdurg Taluk, Belgaum District, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constit...
- 19
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition for Release of Seized Gold Due to Non-Issuance of Notice Under Section 124 of Customs Act, 1962 Within Prescribed Period Under Section 110(2). The court held that continued seizure beyond six months without notice under Section 124 is illegal and directed release of gold.
22 Apr 2015The petitioner, K. Abdulla Kunhi Abdul Rahaman, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnatak...
- 56
