Search Results for "wrongful declaration"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "wrongful declaration"

554 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 554 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Considers Whether Retrospective Absorption Order Requires Review of Earlier Promotional Exercises for Superintendents (Legal/Drafting). Legal Principle Examined: Whether Regular Service for Promotion Can Be Counted Retrospectively When Government Recognises Prior Cadre Status.

30 Jul 2026

The writ petition was filed by two Legal Assistants working in the Law Department of the Government of Goa, who sought a review of the departmental pr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Time Limit for Availing Input Tax Credit Under Section 16(4) of CGST Act. The court held that the time limit is mandatory and not directory, and retrospective amendments are valid.

30 Nov -0001

The Bombay High Court, in a batch of writ petitions, addressed the constitutional validity and interpretation of Section 16(4) of the Central Goods an...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Case on Limitation Issue - Extended Period Invoked for Differential Duty Demand Based on Transfer of Advance Licenses. The Court remanded the matter to CESTAT for fresh consideration on whether the assessee's bonafide belief based on a Tribunal decision later reversed by the Supreme Court precludes invocation of extended period under Section 11A(1) proviso of Central Excise Act, 1944.

4 Jul 2023

The present appeals were filed by the Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs against the order of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Trib...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Karnataka On-Demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016. Petitioners Allege Rules Are Ultra Vires Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Violate Fundamental Rights.

10 Nov 2016

The writ petitions arose from the notification of the Karnataka On-Demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016, by the State Government o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Retired Employees' Writ Petition for Pensionary Benefits Under Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982. Held that aided non-government educational institutions are bound to adopt government pension scheme for employees who retired after the cut-off date.

26 Sep 2025

The petitioners, thirteen retired employees of Dr. Punjabrao Deshmukh Polytechnic, Amravati (respondent No.4), which is run by Shivaji Education Socie...

High Court

CUSTOMS APPEAL NO. 100 OF 2012

29 Jan 2016

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Grants Bail to Illegal Bangladeshi Immigrants with Conditions; Lays Down Guidelines for Detention and Deportation of Foreign Nationals. Court Directs Establishment of Detention Centres and Emphasises Treatment with Dignity for Women and Children Under Foreigners Act, 1946 and Citizenship Act, 1955.

19 May 2020

The case involved a bail petition filed by two Bangladeshi nationals, Babul Khan and Taniya (accused nos. 7 and 10), who were arrested for illegally m...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Pronounces Order on Constitutional Challenge to Karnataka On-demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016. Petitioners Assert Rules Ultra Vires Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Violative of Freedom of Trade and Commerce Under Articles 14, 19(1)(g), and 301 of the Constitution.

10 Nov 2016

The Karnataka High Court considered a batch of writ petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Karnataka On-demand Transportation Techno...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Directs Winding Up of Mutual Fund Schemes and Interprets SEBI Regulations. The Court examined the interrelation and constitutional validity of Regulations 39 to 42 with Regulation 18(15)(c) of the SEBI (Mutual Funds) Regulations, 1996, while deferring final adjudication pending statutory proceedings under the SEBI Act, 1992.

14 Jul 2021

The Supreme Court of India addressed civil appeals concerning the interpretation and application of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Mutual...

High Court

KAHC010069912016_1

10 Nov 2016

...

28 29 30 31 32

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)