Search Results for "reopening after four years"

343 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 343 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Civil Revision Petition for Abatement Due to Failure to Implead Legal Representatives of Deceased Respondent. Delay of 5637 days in seeking substitution not condoned as no sufficient cause shown, resulting in abatement of appeal against deceased respondent.

The petitioner, Sri K.K. Monnappa, filed a civil revision petition under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging an order dated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Stamp Duty Reassessment — Prior Agreement Valuation Binding. Sale Deed Executed in Conformity with Assessed Agreement Cannot Be Reopened Under Section 31A of Indian Stamp Act, 1899 (Goa Amendment).

The petitioners, Mr. Sameer Vasudev Morajkar and Mrs. Prithvi B. Dessai, executed a sale deed dated 16.12.2020 in respect of property measuring 1900 s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice in Income Tax Case for Lack of Failure to Disclose Material Facts. Reassessment after four years requires showing failure to truly and fully disclose material facts, which was not established.

The petitioner, Kapstone Constructions Private Limited, challenged a notice dated 27 March 2019 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Writ Petitions Seeking Revival of Land Acquisition References Due to Inordinate Delay and Laches. Petitioners failed to appear before the Reference Court for over a decade, leading to dismissal of references under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The petitioners filed writ petitions challenging orders of the Civil Judge Senior Division, Omerga, dismissing their Land Acquisition References (LARs...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Tax Appeals in Income Tax Reassessment Case — Limitation for Reopening Assessment Under Section 147/148 of Income Tax Act, 1961. Reassessment Notices Quashed as Issued Beyond Four-Year Limitation Period Without Establishing Failure to Disclose Material Facts.

The case involves five tax appeals filed by M/s. Zephyr Biomedicals and M/s. Orchid Biomedical Systems against the Joint Commissioner of Income Tax, c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Specific Performance with Exemplary Costs for Suppression of Facts and Forum Shopping. Plaintiffs failed to disclose prior pending suit and obtained ex parte orders by misrepresentation, leading to dismissal and costs of Rs. 5 lakhs.

The plaintiffs, Anand Agarwal and Pramila Anand Agarwal, filed a Commercial Suit No. 614 of 2017 before the Bombay High Court seeking specific perform...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Hotel Sale Dispute. Court upholds award of Rs.1.88 crore with interest for breach of contract, rejecting grounds under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Sahara Hospitality Limited (formerly Batra Hospitality Private Limited), filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder and Grievous Hurt in Domestic Violence Case — Life Imprisonment Confirmed. Circumstantial Evidence Including Last Seen and Medical Testimony Sufficient to Prove Guilt Under Sections 302 and 326 IPC.

The appellant, Babu Kunchankuch Vagalil, was convicted by the 11th Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge for Greater Mumbai at Sewree in Sessions Case No.10...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Income Tax Officer in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Corroboration and Unreliable Trap Witnesses. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Smt. K. Chandrika, an Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, was convicted by the Special Judge for CBI Cases, Bangalore, for offences u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Executing Court's Order in Partition Execution — No Jurisdictional Error Found. Executing Court Cannot Go Behind Decree and Objections Under Order 21 Rule 90 CPC Must Be Raised Before Sale Confirmation.

The case arises from a partition suit (Partition Suit No.945 of 1968) filed by the heirs of Bachhusingh, who died intestate on 24-11-1964, concerning ...