KAHC010408942020_1
6 Sep 2022The writ petition was filed by the management of a company engaged in the manufacture of industrial carbon and carbon brushes, classified as a hazardo...
Search Results for "objectivity"
313 result(s) found
Found 313 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Hears Civil Appeals Challenging High Court's Validation of Kamal Vihar Township Development Scheme. Core Legal Question is Whether Scheme Violates Constitution (73rd and 74th Amendments) and Statutory Provisions of M.P. (C.G.) Nagar Thatha Gram Nivesh Adhiniyam, 1973.
1 Aug 2026The Supreme Court heard a bunch of civil appeals arising from the decision of the Division Bench of the High Court of Chhattisgarh, which had upheld t...
- 52
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Land Tribunal Order Due to Inordinate Delay of 31 Years. Unexplained Laches Under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India Barred Discretionary Relief.
26 Feb 2024The petitioners, Smt. Ashabee and Smt. Ramzan Bee @ Khaja Bee, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before th...
- 171
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Modifies Conviction of Accused in Kidnapping Case from Section 364A to Section 363 IPC Due to Insufficient Evidence of Death Threat. The Court found that the prosecution failed to prove the essential ingredient of threat to cause death or hurt under Section 364A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, leading to a reduction in the severity of the offence.
1 Mar 2023The Supreme Court addressed appeals by five accused persons whose convictions under Sections 148, 149, and 364A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, for ki...
- 525
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellants for Counterfeit Currency Offences Under IPC Sections 489B and 489C. Recovery of Fake Notes from Exclusive Possession and Circumstantial Evidence Sufficient to Establish Guilt.
3 Jul 2019The case involves two criminal appeals filed by Sheikh Asif (A1) and Abdul Khalik (A2) against their conviction by the Additional Sessions Judge, Ward...
- 162
High Court
Bombay High Court Disposes First Appeal No. 10836 of 2023 Against Decree in Special Civil Suit No. 181 of 2017. Judgment Reserved on 6 February 2025 and Pronounced on 23 April 2025.
23 Apr 2025Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited (BPCL), a Government of India undertaking, filed a first appeal before the Bombay High Court challenging the judg...
- 29
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Parole Plea of TADA Convict Due to Specific Bar Under Maharashtra Prison Rules. Rule 4(13) read with Rule 19 of the Prisons (Bombay Furlough and Parole) Rules, 1959 disqualifies prisoners convicted under TADA from regular parole, and the Supreme Court's decision in Asfaq v. State of Rajasthan is distinguishable as it did not involve similar state-specific rules.
2 Dec 2022The petitioner, Mo. Hasan Mehndi Hasan Sheikh, a convict serving life imprisonment at Central Jail, Amravati, was convicted for various offences inclu...
- 57
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Issues Comprehensive Directions for Release of Undertrial Prisoners in Suo Motu Public Interest Litigation — Systemic Overcrowding and Violation of Article 21 Rights Addressed. The Court held that the continued incarceration of undertrial prisoners beyond the maximum period of imprisonment for the offences they are charged with violates their fundamental rights under Article 21 of the Constitution, and issued directions to ensure their release and prevent overcrowding.
1 Jan 2026The Supreme Court of India, in a writ petition filed by the National Legal Services Authority (NALSA) under Article 32 of the Constitution, addressed ...
- 71
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Confirms Death Sentence for Rape and Murder of 7½-Year-Old Mentally Challenged Girl. Circumstantial Evidence Including Last Seen, Recovery, and Medical Reports Established Guilt Beyond Doubt; Aggravating Factors Outweighed Mitigating Factors.
6 May 2022The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals of Manoj Pratap Singh, upholding his conviction and death sentence for the kidnapping, rape, and murder of a 7...
- 191
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Penalty for Excess Load Consumption as Unauthorised Use of Electricity Under Section 126 of Electricity Act, 2003 — Assessment at Twice the Higher Tariff Applicable for the Category of Use, Not Consumer's Category. The court held that consumption in excess of connected load constitutes unauthorised use under Explanation (b)(iv) and assessment under Section 126(6) must be at twice the tariff for the category for which electricity was unauthorisedly used.
9 Dec 2022The case involves a batch of appeals by the Kerala State Electricity Board (KSEB) against a judgment of the Kerala High Court which held that for unau...
- 219
