Search Results for "muddemal"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "muddemal"

896 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 896 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Provisions. The court upheld the acquittal of the accused for cultivation of opium poppy plants as the prosecution failed to comply with Section 42 of the NDPS Act regarding recording of information and search procedures.

20 Mar 2020

The State of Maharashtra filed an appeal against the judgment and order dated 17th May 2000 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Satara in Sessions C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Four Convicts in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Sections 42 and 50 of NDPS Act, 1985. Procedural Violations in Search and Seizure Lead to Acquittal of Appellants Convicted Under Section 20(b) of NDPS Act.

7 Dec 2018

The appellants, Pratap Bhimsingh Parera, Gangadhar Babaji Lenaka, Mrs. Savita Pratap Parera, and Mrs. Santoshi Santosh Pradhan, were convicted by the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Intent and Benefit of Doubt — Conviction Under Section 302 IPC Set Aside, Altered to Section 304 Part II IPC for Culpable Homicide Not Amounting to Murder. The court found that the evidence did not establish murder but indicated a suicide pact, leading to alteration of conviction.

15 Jun 2022

The appellant, Sumit Brijbihari Giri, was convicted by the Second Additional Sessions Judge, Thane, in Sessions Case No. 287/2008 for the murder of Sa...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Applications Challenging Conviction Under Electricity Act for Theft of Energy — Held That Theft of Electricity is a Continuing Offence and Limitation Under Section 468 CrPC Does Not Apply.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment pertains to a batch of criminal revision applications filed by Kailaskumar Bhawarlal Jain challenging his conviction under Section 39 of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Bail Under Section 437(6) CrPC for Trial Delay Beyond 60 Days — Accused Entitled to Default Bail Despite Seriousness of Offence. The court held that Section 437(6) CrPC is mandatory and confers a right to bail if trial is not concluded within 60 days from first date of evidence, and the accused is not responsible for the delay.

19 Jul 2022

The applicant, Snehdip S/o Shriram Soni, was arraigned as accused No.1 in a crime registered for offences under Sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471 read ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Narcotics Control Bureau Against Acquittal in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 50. Failure to Inform Accused of Right to be Searched Before Gazetted Officer or Magistrate Renders Search Illegal and Conviction Unsustainable.

11 Aug 2020

The appeal was filed by the Narcotics Control Bureau against the acquittal of the respondent for an offence under Section 21 read with Section 8(c) of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Victim's Claim for Return of Stolen Property in Criminal Writ Petition — Property Directed to be Returned to First Informant Rather Than Goldsmiths from Whom It Was Recovered. The Court Held That the Victim of Theft Is Entitled to Return of Stolen Property Under Section 457 CrPC, Not the Persons from Whom It Was Recovered, Absent Any Claim of Ownership.

28 Aug 2013

The petitioner, Anandi Roy, lodged a report with Osmanpura Police Station, Aurangabad, alleging theft of gold ornaments and cash worth Rs. 89,300 from...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Bail Under Section 437(6) CrPC for Trial Delay Beyond 60 Days — Accused Entitled to Default Bail Despite Seriousness of Offence. The court held that Section 437(6) CrPC is mandatory and once the statutory period expires without trial conclusion and accused not at fault, bail must be granted.

19 Jul 2022

The applicant, Snehdip S/o Shriram Soni, was arraigned as accused No.1 in a crime registered at Gadchiroli Police Station for offences under Sections ...

High Court

High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in NDPS Act Case Due to Non-Compliance of Section 50(1) Mandatory Search Safeguards. Accused Was Not Informed of Her Right to Be Searched Before Gazetted Officer or Magistrate, Vitating the Search and Seizure.

7 Dec 2010

The State of Maharashtra preferred an appeal against the acquittal of the respondent, Sou. Shobha Ganesh Gaikwad, who was charged under Section 20(b)(...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Allows Appeal Against Conviction Under Sections 307 and 332 IPC Due to Lack of Evidence of Intention to Kill and Illegal Arrest. Conviction Under Section 135 Bombay Police Act Also Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Gupti Assault Caused by Blunt Side and Injury Was Simple.

7 Jan 2011

In 1995, a police head constable, Mohammad Khan Pathan, and other police personnel from Itwara police station, Nanded, were ordered by Police Inspecto...

28 29 30 31 32

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)