Search Results for "major child"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "major child"

544 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 544 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals and Directs Separate Cut-Off Marks for Persons with Disabilities in Judicial Services Recruitment. The Court held that exclusion of visually impaired candidates from judicial services is unconstitutional and that PwBD candidates are entitled to relaxation of selection criteria under Section 34 of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016.

10 Mar 2025

The Supreme Court of India, in a suo motu writ petition and connected matters, addressed the issue of recruitment of persons with disabilities (PwD) i...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 376(2)(i) and 452 IPC and Section 4 POCSO Act set aside as victim's evidence found untrustworthy and medical evidence inconclusive.

13 Aug 2024

The case involves an appeal against the conviction of Kishore Vitthalrao Shendre for offences under Sections 376(2)(i) and 452 of the Indian Penal Cod...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to DNA Evidence Inconsistency and Unreliable Testimony. Conviction under Section 376(2)(f)(l) IPC and Section 6 POCSO Act set aside as DNA report excluded semen and blood of accused, and victim's testimony was tutored.

23 Jul 2024

The appellant, Bhaiyya S/o Vijay Chakre, was convicted by the Special Judge, Achalpur, for offences under Section 376(2)(f)(l) of the Indian Penal Cod...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Three Accused in Murder Case Based on Injured Eyewitness Testimony — Minor Discrepancies and Reading of Police Statement Do Not Discredit Credible Witnesses. The court held that the testimony of injured eyewitnesses, corroborated by an independent witness, is sufficient to sustain a conviction for murder under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC.

19 Jul 2024

The appellants, Ravindra (father), Ashish, and Vaibhav (sons), were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Amravati, for the murder of their neig...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals in Motor Accident Claims, Holds Insurance Company Liable Despite Breach of Policy Conditions. The court directed pay and recover from the owner for violation of permit conditions, relying on Section 149 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

8 Mar 2024

The case arises from a motor accident that occurred on an unspecified date, involving a vehicle owned by Shrihari s/o Kalyanrao Parkale (respondent No...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubt Over Cause of Death. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Medical Evidence Did Not Establish Hammer Blow as Cause of Death, and Eye Witness Testimony Was Contradictory.

10 Oct 2023

The appellant, Satish Suresh Shrisundar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad, in Sessions Case No.200/2014 on 29.12.2016 for of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Inconsistencies in Prosecution Case. Conviction under Sections 302, 120-B r/w 34 IPC set aside as circumstantial evidence failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

10 Jun 2021

The appellants, Akbar Khan Ajmer Khan and Akram @ Babalu Rafique Khan, were convicted by the Ad hoc District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Na...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Public Interest Litigation Seeking Directions to Media Not to Disclose Rape Victim Identity. Court Holds That Section 228-A IPC and Supreme Court Directions in Nipun Saxena Case Must Be Strictly Followed by Print and Electronic Media.

19 Jan 2021

The petitioner, Sangita Tanpure, the mother of a rape victim, filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Bombay High Court seeking directions to th...

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Upholds Conviction of Appellants for Murder, Robbery, and Criminal Conspiracy in Brutal Killing of Woman. Circumstantial Evidence Including Last Seen Theory and Recovery of Stolen Articles Sufficient to Prove Guilt Under Sections 302, 394, 365, 201 read with 120-B IPC.

8 May 2020

The case pertains to the brutal murder of a woman in Goa in October 2009. The prosecution alleged that the appellants, along with a co-accused and a j...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Denial of Permission for Ayurvedic College Admission. Order Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice and Non-Application of Mind; Direction to Reconsider After Hearing.

18 Sep 2019

The petitioners, Shri Gajanan Maharaj Sansthan Pusad and its Ayurvedic Medical College, challenged an order dated 19.07.2019 passed by the Union of In...

28 29 30 31 32

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)