Search Results for "income escaped assessment"

376 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 376 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Income Tax Penalty Case — Typographical Error in Return Does Not Attract Penalty Under Section 271(1)(c). Bonafide belief and full disclosure of transaction negate mens rea for concealment.

The appellant, Ms. Saritha Jain, an income tax assessee, sold her shares in M/s. Vision Health Services (P) Ltd., an Indian company, to M/s. Perot Sys...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Prosecution of Directors for Delayed TDS Deposit Under Section 276B Income Tax Act — Delay Not Equivalent to Failure to Pay. Vicarious Liability Requires Specific Averments of Being In-Charge and Responsible; No Notice Under Section 2(35) or Order Under Section 201(1) Passed.

The petitioners, directors of M/s. Hubtown Ltd., challenged the issuance of process against them under Section 276B r/w 278B of the Income Tax Act, 19...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Tax Appeals in Income Tax Reassessment Case — Limitation for Reopening Assessment Under Section 147/148 of Income Tax Act, 1961. Reassessment Notices Quashed as Issued Beyond Four-Year Limitation Period Without Establishing Failure to Disclose Material Facts.

The case involves five tax appeals filed by M/s. Zephyr Biomedicals and M/s. Orchid Biomedical Systems against the Joint Commissioner of Income Tax, c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Remands Income Tax Appeal to High Court for Non-Compliance with Section 260A Procedure. The High Court failed to frame substantial questions of law as mandated under Section 260A(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, leading to procedural irregularity.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax against the Bombay High Court's order dismissing the Revenue's appeal und...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notices in Sales Tax Case Due to Lack of Reasonable Belief — Reopening Based on Mere Suspicion and Incomplete Information Held Invalid Under Section 35 of Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 and Rule 9A of Central Sales Tax (Bombay) Rules, 1957.

The petitioners, Shree Venkateshwara Petro Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India chall...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Tax Appeals in Reassessment Cases Under Section 147 of Income Tax Act, 1961. No Substantial Question of Law Found as Tribunal's Findings Were Based on Appreciation of Evidence.

The judgment pertains to multiple tax appeals filed by individual assessees against the Commissioner of Income Tax, Goa. The appellants, including Sha...