Search Results for "gratuity"

816 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 816 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Retired Teacher Challenging Recovery of Excess Salary from Gratuity. Recovery of Rs.1,39,316/- Set Aside as Payment Was Due to Departmental Error Without Misrepresentation by Employee.

The petitioner, Ashok Buchayya Pusalwar, was an Assistant Teacher with the Zilla Parishad, Gadchiroli, appointed on 24-10-1996. He voluntarily retired...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Challenge to Counting of Contractual Service for Continuity in Tribal Training Institutes. Past Contractual Service Prior to Regularisation Must Be Counted for Continuity and Pensionary Benefits Except Monetary Benefits.

The Bombay High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by the State of Maharashtra challenging the order of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal dat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Widow's Claim for Compassionate Pension Following Dismissal of Husband for Unauthorised Absenteeism. Rule 45 of Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982 disentitles a dismissed employee's family to pension.

The petitioners, Sau. Saroj Wd/o Magan Damare and Sekhar Magan Damare, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Bench at Aurangabad, seekin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Retiral Benefits of Ayurvedic Medical Officer - Petitioner Entitled to Higher Pay Scale and Full Pension, Gratuity with Interest. The court directed payment of retiral benefits with 6% interest from retirement date within three months.

The petitioner, Digambar Vitthal Gaikwad (since deceased, represented by legal heirs), was appointed as a Medical Officer on 5 December 1978 holding t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions of Retired Employees Seeking Pensionary Benefits Under Zilla Parishad and Jeevan Pradhikaran Rules. Court Holds That Prior Service as Daily Wagers Counts Towards Qualifying Service for Pension After Absorption.

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed by retired employees of the Zilla Parishad, Latur, and Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran. The petitione...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows MSRTC Petition in Guarantor Recovery Dispute — Industrial Court Order Set Aside for Lack of Employer-Employee Relationship. Co-guarantor cannot claim protection under MRTU & PULP Act against employer of principal debtor as recovery action is not an unfair labour practice.

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC), challenged the judgment and order dated 05.10.2016 of the Industrial Court, Nagp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petitions Challenging Labour Court Orders in Unfair Labour Practice Complaints. Summary jurisdiction under Section 28 of MRTU & PULP Act does not bar determination of disputed employer-employee relationship when status is prima facie established.

The judgment involves three writ petitions filed by Birla Cotsyn (India) Ltd., the employer, challenging identical orders passed by the Labour Court a...