Search Results for "document marking"

299 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 299 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Injunction Suit — Reverses Appellate Court's Dismissal and Restores Trial Court's Decree. Held that the appellate court erred in reversing the trial court's judgment without properly considering the evidence regarding possession and title.

The appellants, as plaintiffs, filed a suit for bare injunction in O.S.No.52 of 2008 before the District Munsif Court, Thuraiyur, seeking to restrain ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal and Allows Cross-Objection for Enhanced Compensation in Motor Accident Claim — Negligence of Driver Proved, No Contributory Negligence by Deceased, and Claimants Entitled to Higher Compensation Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor accident that occurred on 18.06.2015 at about 9.30 p.m. near Jafarwadi village, Belagavi. The deceased, one Manjunath, wa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Lack of Conscious Possession and Procedural Lapses. Conviction under Sections 21(c), 23(c) read with 28 of NDPS Act set aside as prosecution failed to prove possession of contraband beyond reasonable doubt.

The case involves three criminal appeals arising from a common judgment of the XXXIII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge and Special Judge (NDPS...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Lack of Conscious Possession and Procedural Lapses. Conviction under Sections 21(c), 23(c) read with 28 of NDPS Act set aside as prosecution failed to prove possession of contraband beyond reasonable doubt.

The case involves three criminal appeals arising from a common judgment of the XXXIII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge and Special Judge (NDPS...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Preventive Detention Order Beyond Three Months Under Preventive Detention Act, 1950. Interpretation of 'Such Detention' in Article 22(4)(a) of the Constitution Confirmed to Refer to Preventive Detention, Not Period of Detention.

The case involved a constitutional challenge to an order of preventive detention under the Preventive Detention Act, 1950, as amended. The appellant, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appellant in Amendment of Plaint to Add Alternative Claim Despite Limitation Bar. All necessary facts already pleaded; interest of justice warranted amendment under Order VI Rule 17 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

The dispute arose from a commercial transaction where the appellants, L. J. Leach and Company Ltd., filed a suit for damages against the respondents, ...