Search Results for "common law rights"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "common law rights"

5176 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5176 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Disposes of Appeals by Authority for Advance Rulings Against High Court Judgment Quashing AAR's Rejection of Treaty Benefits. Questions Raised on Taxation of Capital Gains Under India-Mauritius DTAA and Scope of Section 245R(2) Proviso (iii) of Income Tax Act, 1961.

1 Jan 1970

The disputes arose from applications for advance ruling filed by three Mauritius-incorporated companies—Tiger Global International II Holdings, Tige...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Hears Numerous Writ Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Notifications and Demands. Petitioners Contend That the Notifications under the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 are Ultra Vires the Constitution and Central Forest Laws.

3 Dec 2015

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Division Bench Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging the Validity of State Notification Imposing Forest Development Tax on Mining Leases. The Petitioners Seek Declaration that the Notification is Ultra Vires the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 and the Constitution.

3 Dec 2015

...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Hears Revenue Appeal on Deletion of Additions for Bogus Transportation, Illegal Mining, and Helicopter Expenses. The Court Examines Whether the ITAT's Deletions Were Perverse and Whether Cross-Examination Rights Were Adequately Protected Under the Income Tax Act, 1961.

17 Mar 2023

The appeal before the Karnataka High Court arose from an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Bengaluru, which partly allowed the assess...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Whether Notification 14/2010-ST is Clarificatory for Service Tax on Drilling Rigs in Continental Shelf. Appeal Admitted on Questions of Territorial Applicability of Service Tax to Offshore Drilling Services Under Finance Act, 1994.

28 Apr 2015

The appellant, M/s. Greatship (India) Ltd., entered into contracts with ONGC in February and May 2009 to provide offshore drilling services using hire...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dharwad Bench Hears Revenue Appeal Against ITAT Order Deleting Penalty Under Section 271(1)(c) for Assessment Year 2006-07 Due to Defective Notice; Questions Validity of Penalty Initiation Despite Retrospective Amendment to Section 271(1B)

17 Mar 2023

The appeal before the High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, arose from the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bengaluru, which had allowed ...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Considers Writ Petitions Against Government Order Appointing Administrator for Murugha Mutt Under Articles 162 and 31A of Constitution; Appointment Follows Pontiff's Judicial Custody in Criminal Case

22 May 2023

The writ petitions, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, challenged a Government Order dated 13.12.2022 appointing a retired IAS offi...

High Court

WRIT PETITION NO.1430 OF 2011

1 Jan 1970

...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Heard Constitutional Challenge to Section 31-A of the NDPS Act, 1985, Imposing Mandatory Death Penalty for Repeat Drug Offences. The petition questioned whether mandatory death penalty for non-homicidal drug offences under Section 31-A violates fundamental rights under Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India.

16 Jun 2011

The matter involved two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the constitutional validity of Section 31-A of the Narc...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Expenditure Tax Act Classification Between Hindu and Mappilla Undivided Families. Differential Treatment of Hindu Undivided Families and Mappilla Families Under Marumakkattayam Law is Not Discriminatory Under Article 14 of Constitution of India, 1950.

26 Feb 1969

The case concerned a challenge under Article 14 of the Constitution to Section 3(1) of the Expenditure-tax Act, 1957. The appellant was the karta of a...

28 29 30 31 32

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)