Search Results for "commercial arbitration application"

1010 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1010 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Holds High Court Has Exclusive Jurisdiction Under Section 29A(4) of Arbitration Act for Extension of Time. The term 'Court' in Section 29A(4) is interpreted to mean the High Court, not the Civil Court, to ensure uniformity and avoid multiplicity of proceedings.

The case arose from a dispute between Jagdeep Chowgule (appellant) and Sheela Chowgule & Ors. (respondents) concerning the jurisdiction to entertain a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Income Tax Case — Reassessment Notice Invalid Beyond Four Years Without Allegation of Non-Disclosure. Arbitration Award Receipt Held as Capital Receipt, Not Income Under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

The appellant, Ramona Pinto, an individual, filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against an order dated 2nd April 2018 pass...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Arbitral Tribunal's Jurisdictional Order as Not Maintainable. Remedy Lies Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 After Final Award.

The petitioner, Tirupati Shopping Centre Premises Co-op. Society Limited, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of Indi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Against Setting Aside of Arbitral Awards for Lack of Concluded Contract. Joint Exploration Agreement Held Not Binding as Conditions Precedent Not Fulfilled, Resulting in No Valid Arbitration Agreement.

The case involves appeals by Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. and Prize Petroleum Company Ltd. (appellants) against M3nergy Sdn. Bhd. (respondent)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award as Time-Barred Under Section 34(3) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Application for Correction of Clerical Error Does Not Extend Limitation Period for Challenging Award.

The petitioners, Dr. Writer's Food Products Pvt. Ltd. and two individuals, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Petitions by Cab Company Against Drivers, Appoints Sole Arbitrator. Arbitration clause in Driver Agreement survives termination under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Meru Cab Company Private Limited, filed four arbitration petitions under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, see...