Search Results for "circumstantial evidence"

3840 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3840 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction under Sections 302, 506, 341 r/w 34 IPC and Sections 3 & 27 of Arms Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case pertains to the murder of one person on 25.05.2002 at Maragodu Village, Madikeri Taluk. The appellant Kattemane Ganesha (accused No.1) was co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder and Dowry Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence. Conviction under Sections 498A, 302, 201 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove cruelty and murder beyond reasonable doubt.

The case involves an appeal against conviction under Sections 498A, 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code. The appellants, Ankush Chandekar and Bayabai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Commutes Death Sentence to Life Imprisonment in Murder and Theft Case — Conviction Under Sections 302 and 379 IPC Upheld but Death Penalty Not Warranted as Case Does Not Fall Within 'Rarest of Rare' Category.

The appellant, Sarvanand @ Soiru Gaonkar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Margao, for the murder of Raya Datta Fal Dessai (Dada) and h...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Dacoity Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 395 IPC set aside as identification parade was not conducted and recovery of stolen articles was not linked to accused.

The case pertains to two criminal appeals filed by accused persons convicted under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) for dacoity. The p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inadmissible Confession and Insufficient Circumstantial Evidence. Extra-judicial confession made in police custody held inadmissible under Section 26 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872, leading to acquittal under Section 302 IPC.

The appellant, Dharma Krishna Bhoye, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for the murder of one person and sentenced to life...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Circumstantial Evidence Fails to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellants, Irappa Ghatgyappa Magdum and Vijay Irappa Magdum, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Gadhinglaj, in Sessions Trial No. 9...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Witness Testimony. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Mangalabai Yashanna Shekapure, was convicted by the III Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur in Sessions Trial No. 58 of 2002 for the mur...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Shrikant Hanmant Bijargi, was convicted by the 1st Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Sangli, in Sessions Case No. 154 of 2002 for the mu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Direct Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction based on motive and last seen theory fails as prosecution witnesses turned hostile and medical evidence inconsistent with alleged weapon.

The appellant, Kashiram Ravaji Mene, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Ratnagiri, in Sessions Case No.4 of 2003 for the murder of his sister-in-law...