Search Results for "Madras General Sales Tax Act"

334 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 334 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Assessees' Appeals in Interest Tax Dispute on Hire-Purchase Transactions. The interest component in hire-purchase instalments is not taxable under Section 2(7) of the Interest-Tax Act, 1974 as hire-purchase transactions are not loans or advances.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by M/s Muthoot Leasing and Finance Limited and other assessees, setting aside the judgment of the Kerala H...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Considers Suo Motu Reference on Summoning Advocates During Investigation; Examines Scope of Advocate-Client Privilege and Need for Guidelines to Prevent Coercive Summons. Court Addresses Legality of Direct Summons to Lawyers Under Section 179 BNSS and Absence of Judicial Oversight.

The Supreme Court initiated suo motu proceedings following a reference from a two-judge bench in a Special Leave Petition challenging a notice issued ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Part and Reverses High Court's Decision that Electricity is Not 'Goods' Under Sales Tax Acts. Electricity is Movable Property and Covered by Definition of 'Goods', Making Electricity Board a Dealer; Supply of Steam Under Works Contract Not Taxable.

The case concerned the taxability under the C.P. & Berar Sales Tax Act, 1947, and the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1959, of transactions unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Building Contractors' Appeals Against Purchase Tax Assessment Under M.P. Sales Tax Act. Notice Period Directory, Contractors Held 'Dealers', and Consumption of Materials in Construction Attracts Purchase Tax Under Section 7.

The appellants, a firm of building contractors registered as dealers under the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1958, purchased taxable building ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Assessee's Exclusion of Sale Proceeds from Turnover in Central Sales Tax Case. Isolated Sale of Discarded Fixed Assets Not Considered Part of Dealer's Business Activity Under Section 2(b) of Central Sales Tax Act, 1956.

The dispute arose out of assessment proceedings under the Madras General Sales Tax Act, 1959, read with the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, concerning th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Union’s Excise Duty Demand on Steel Wires; Manufacturer’s Challenge Dismissed. Interpretation of Item 26AA of Central Excise Act as a Rate of Duty, Not Dependent on Origin of Raw Material, Confirmed.

The case arose from the imposition of excise duty under the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, on steel wires manufactured by the appellant, J.K. Ste...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Assessment of Profit from Land Transaction as Adventure in Nature of Trade. Single Transaction of Purchase and Subdivision of Estate into Plots with Resale Held to Constitute Business Profit Under Section 34(1)(a) of Income-tax Act, 1922.

The assessee, P. M. Mohammad Meerakhan, entered into an agreement on 15th August 1955 to purchase 477.71 acres of land called Kuttikal Estate for Rs. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Validity of Forward Contract Prohibition; Contracts Void Under Section 3 of Travancore-Cochin Public Safety Measures Act 5 of 1950. Pre-Constitution Bill Did Not Require President’s Sanction Under Article 304(b) as No Amendment Covered by Article Was Moved.

The dispute arose from forward contracts for the purchase of coconut oil entered into in 1952 in the former Cochin State. The respondent, a commission...